Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Evelyn S and K E Barrett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
73
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

International$1.2MEducation$628kHuman Services$425kFood & Nutrition$386kHealth$361kYouth Development$238kReligion$174kArts & Culture$111kOther$0
02FY2025 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k56 grants · $973k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.4M
$20,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Safe Passage$150,000
The Lunchbox Fund$100,000
Good Shepherd Food Bank$100,000
Pine Tree Society$100,000
Save the Children$100,000
The Global Fund for Children$100,000
Baby2Baby$100,000
World Vision$100,000
Unicef USA$100,000
Mercy Ships$100,000
Episcopal Relief and Development$75,000
Barbara Bush Children's Hospital$75,000
Maine Seacoast Mission$50,000
Flying Kites Inc$50,000
Covenant House$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $556k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Family Services of the Merrimack Va: $10k → 10%Covenant to Care for Children: $10k → 11%The Cove Center for Grieving Childr: $5k → 12%Project Sweet Peas: $20k → 7%Tears Foundation: $10k → 9%Haven Violence Prevention Services: $15k → 5%Grahamtastic Connection: $30k → 9%Area Interfaith Outreach: $15k → 11%The Children's Room: $25k → 8%Family Services of the Merrimack Va: $3k → 10%Covenant to Care for Children: $8k → 11%Project Sweet Peas: $10k → 7%Grahamtastic Connection: $18k → 9%The Children's Room: $10k → 8%Covenant to Care for Children: $8k → 11%Cove Center for Grieving Children I: $6k → 12%Project Sweet Peas: $10k → 7%Gather: $10k → 5%Grahamtastic Connection: $10k → 9%Area Interfaith Outreach: $10k → 11%Rise Above Foundation Inc: $20k → 11%Project Sweet Peas: $10k → 7%Grahamtastic Connection: $10k → 9%Rise Above Foundation Inc: $10k → 11%LearningWorks: $8k → 7%Grahamtastic Connection: $6k → 9%Rise Above Foundation Inc: $8k → 11%Covenant House: $10k → 17%Episcopal Relief and Development: $75k → 17%LearningWorks: $20k → 7%Episcopal Relief and Development: $20k → 17%Episcopal Relief and Development: $20k → 17%Episcopal Relief and Development: $20k → 17%Episcopal Relief and Development: $19k → 17%Covenant House: $50k → 17%Preble Street: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 28% of Evelyn S and K E Barrett Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 51% of the giving stays in ME; read by stated purpose it is 44% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Evelyn S and K E Barrett Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 38% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 46 repeat orgs$723k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

46 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
12

Total granted

$2.9M
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-15%

Still filing today

96%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $610k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $174k · revenue +54%
  • PT
    PINE TREE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +85%
  • TL
    THE LUNCHBOX FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $138k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • WM
    WORD MADE FLESH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -25%
  • WC
    WORLD'S CHILDREN
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue -26%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
2
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
3
Haiti Babi

Haiti Babi is a not for profit social enterprise that employs mothers in Haiti to knit and crochet high quality artisanal baby products. One in ten children in Haiti lives in an orphanage and 80% of those children have living parents who…

—
4
Whole Child International

Whole Child International promotes positive developmental outcomes for children through child protection systems strengthening and improving the quality of care for children in low- and middle-income countries.

Youth Development
5
Street Child Us

Street Child's vision is a world in which all children are safe, in school and learning. We believe that education is not only a fundamental human right but the surest pathway out of poverty, and that schools should be a site of safety as…

International
6
Empower African Children

To create transformative and globally connected learning experiences, preparing orphaned and vulnerable children for a lifetime of influence.

—
7
Love the Hungry Inc

The corporation is organized to provide nutritious fortified meals throughout the world to children and families that are most vunerable to hunger and malnutriion.

Food & Nutrition
8
Human Rights for Kids

Human Rights for Kids is an international non-profit organization dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights for children. We use an integrated, multi-faceted approach which consists of research & public education, coalition…

International
9
Childcare Worldwide

Childcare Worldwide (CW) transforms children's lives by exposing them to the gospel of Jesus Christ, providing for their physical needs, and sponsoring their education. We connect sponsors with children through Christ-based life centers.…

International
10
Earthchildren Rescue Incorporated

Earthchildren builds sustainable cities and communities in dark and hard to reach places with a focus on vulnerable women and orphaned children. we create programs that deliver holistic and balanced services including learning centers and…

International
11
Project Giving Kids

We can build a more empathetic and equitable world by connecting kids and families to community service opportunities in an inspiring, accessible, and approachable way.

—
12
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Project Sweet Peas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Elementary Literacy TutoringCancer Support ServicesChristian Youth CampsHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/81
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,484

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/81
Grantees still filing
51/81
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Safe Passage — $214,500 · InternationalSafe PassageUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $160,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFWORLD VISION INC — $140,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCMercy Ships International — $122,000 · InternationalMercy Ships InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $100,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncFLYING KITES INC — $77,500 · InternationalFLYING KITES INCHELP THE HELPLESS — $57,634 · InternationalBE LIKE BRIT FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · InternationalProject Suma Inc — $55,000 · InternationalHOPE WALKS INC — $40,000 · International+6 more — $78,500 · International+6 moreEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $173,500 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DE…THE LUNCHBOX FUND — $138,000 · Human ServicesTHE LUNCHBOX FUNDGrahamtastic Connection — $73,500 · Human ServicesGrahamtastic ConnectionCOVENANT HOUSE — $60,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSELITTLE WISHES — $52,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE WISHESProject Sweet Peas — $50,000 · Human ServicesProject Sweet PeasRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC — $37,500 · Human ServicesThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children — $35,000 · Human ServicesLEARNINGWORKS — $27,500 · Human Services+8 more — $118,500 · Human Services+8 moreBarbara Bush Children's Hospital — $135,000 · OtherBarbara Bush Children's Hos…BABY2BABY — $100,000 · OtherBABY2BABYMaine Seacoast Mission — $97,000 · OtherMaine Seacoast MissionEVKIDS INC — $52,500 · OtherEVKIDS INCBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC — $35,000 · OtherWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL — $60,000 · OtherWATER FIRST INTERNATIONALEDUCATION AND HOPE INC — $50,000 · OtherEDUCATION AND HOPE INCSAHA GLOBAL INC — $60,000 · OtherSAHA GLOBAL INCFAR AWAY FRIENDS INC — $34,000 · Other+22 more — $278,200 · Other+22 morePINE TREE SOCIETY INC — $150,000 · EducationPINE TREE…MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION — $65,000 · EducationMY STUFF …The Foundation for Tomorrow Inc — $39,100 · EducationThe Found…ALEXANDRIA TUTORING CONSORTIUM INC — $23,000 · EducationALEXANDRI…RAZIAS RAY OF HOPE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION — $15,000 · Education+2 more — $20,000 · Education+2 moreCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $100,500 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN — $100,000 · Arts & CultureSHAREBABY INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureLITERATIONS CORP — $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN — $53,000 · Youth DevelopmentGAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC — $26,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG AUDIENCES OF VIRGINIA INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentConfiKids Inc — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLANTERN LIGHT CAMPS INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Telling Room — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentA LEG TO STAND ON INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMy Place Teen Center Inc — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentGood Shepherd Food Bank — $107,500 · Food & NutritionBE KIND SAN ANTONIO INC — $40,000 · Food & NutritionLocker Project — $35,000 · Food & NutritionEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
International$1,100,134Human Services$765,500Other$901,700Education$327,100Arts & Culture$225,500Youth Development$216,500Food & Nutrition$197,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSafe Passage — $214,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $173,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $160,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINE TREE SOCIETY INC — $150,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LUNCHBOX FUND — $138,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMercy Ships International — $122,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank — $107,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $100,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMaine Seacoast Mission — $97,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLITERATIONS CORP — $80,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFLYING KITES INC — $77,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGrahamtastic Connection — $73,500 over 5y, 10% of budgetMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSAHA GLOBAL INC — $60,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL — $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELP THE HELPLESS — $57,634 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBE LIKE BRIT FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetProject Suma Inc — $55,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN — $53,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetEVKIDS INC — $52,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetLITTLE WISHES — $52,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetEDUCATION AND HOPE INC — $50,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetProject Sweet Peas — $50,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetHOPE WALKS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBE KIND SAN ANTONIO INC — $40,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetThe Foundation for Tomorrow Inc — $39,100 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC — $37,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLocker Project — $35,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children — $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAR AWAY FRIENDS INC — $34,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetLEARNINGWORKS — $27,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC — $26,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAREA INTERFAITH OUTREACH — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC — $25,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSHAREBABY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALEXANDRIA TUTORING CONSORTIUM INC — $23,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNEWBORNS IN NEED INC — $21,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL PEARLS INC — $20,700 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAndroscoggin Home Health Services Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORD MADE FLESH INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLUCY'S LOVE BUS CHARITABLE TRUST INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD'S CHILDREN — $16,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bangor Savings Bank F…Maine Community Found…Agnes M Lindsay TrustAmerican Tower Corpor…Boston Foundation IncSimmons Foundation - …Sam L Cohen FoundationDavis Family Foundati…Eastern Bank Foundati…Machias Savings Bank …Fisher Charitable Fou…John T Gorman Foundat…
Bangor Savings Bank FoundationME28.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Sam L Cohen Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Machias Savings Bank Community Development Foundation · Fisher Charitable Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Evelyn S and K E Barrett Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Covenant to Care for Children Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Rise Above Foundation Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Leap for Education Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Evkids Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evelyn S and K E Barrett Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Evelyn S and K E Barrett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home