Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Esther and Harold Mertz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$52M
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$62MEnvironment$48MHealth$8.7MPhilanthropy$4.0MInternational$1.8MHuman Services$300kPublic Benefit$115kFood & Nutrition$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+3 grants · $54M
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$666M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$52,143,750
PINES FOUNDATION$1,000,000
FREEDOM ALLIANCE$400,000
HOPE FOR NEW YORK$200,000
GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC$15,000
AMERICA'S VETDOGS$15,000
SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
BACK ON MY FEET$10,000
THE BANQUET$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HELEN KELLER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 20%HELEN KELLER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $16k → 20%HELEN KELLER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 20%HELEN KELLER SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 50% of Esther and Harold Mertz Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Esther and Harold Mertz Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$69M · 12 repeat orgs$56M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$69M
$56M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+62%

Still filing today

83%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $62M · revenue +392%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR NEW YORK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +3%
  • FREEDOM ALLIANCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • SF
    SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $48M
  • PINES OF SARASOTA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8.5M · revenue +138%
  • TH
    TOP HONORS INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
4
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Search for Change Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…

Human Services
7
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
8
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
11
The Support Sight Foundation

Empower and educate sight-impaired individuals and their families with disease education knowledge, tools and technology so they may live more independently and maintain a high quality of life.

Health
12
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of South Dakota & Montana and the most unlike its peers is National Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $62,152,241 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION+3 more — $120,000 · EducationSOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT — $47,700,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTPINES FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 · Other+7 more — $255,000 · OtherPINES OF SARASOTA FOUNDATION INC — $8,500,000 · Health+1 more — $15,000 · HealthHOPE FOR NEW YORK — $1,950,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $40,000 · PhilanthropyFREEDOM ALLIANCE — $1,750,000 · InternationalRESTORE NYC INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesBACK ON MY FEET — $130,000 · Human ServicesHelen Keller Services — $85,800 · Human ServicesAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC — $115,000 · Public Benefit
Education$62,272,241Other$49,955,000Health$8,515,000Philanthropy$1,990,000International$1,750,000Human Services$365,800Public Benefit$115,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $62,152,241 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetHOPE FOR NEW YORK — $1,950,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE — $1,750,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetRESTORE NYC INC — $150,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET — $130,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC — $115,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $115,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHelen Keller Services — $85,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BANQUET — $40,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPARKYOUTH NYC INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLong Island Alzheimers and Dementia Center Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTHEAST TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sanford Group ReturnSD13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sanford Group Return · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Esther and Harold Mertz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph