Skip to content
Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas at a glance

· Private foundation

Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6.6M
Granted FY2022
28
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$6.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Philanthropy$6.3MHealth$707kReligion$305kHuman Services$147kEducation$129kHousing & Shelter$124kCrime & Legal$84kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2022 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $246k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.3M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPISCOPAL FOUNDATION OF DALLAS$6,315,341
Episcopal Diocese of Dallas$50,000
Julia's Center for Healthcare$21,000
ABIDE WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES$20,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC$17,000
ROSA ES ROJO INC$15,000
St John's Episcopal School$15,000
MEN OF NEHEMIAH$12,000
BROTHER BILL'S HELPING HAND$12,000
THE VITAMIN BRIDGE$12,000
Hope Clinic of McKinney$12,000
INCARNATION PLACE$10,000
The Bridge Breast Network$10,000
TRAFFICK911$10,000
NEXUS RECOVERY CENTER INCORPORATED$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Hope's Door New Beginning Center: $5k → 5%ROSA ES ROJO INC: $15k → 5%ROSA ES ROJO INC: $8k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY: $10k → 5%MOMMIES IN NEED: $5k → 14%Child Protective Services Community Partners: $3k → 14%MEN OF NEHEMIAH: $12k → 14%MEN OF NEHEMIAH: $10k → 14%MEN OF NEHEMIAH: $7k → 14%CHRISTIANWORKS FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%CHRISTIANWORKS FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%WOMEN IN NEED OF GENEROUS SUPPORT: $10k → 14%WOMEN IN NEED OF GENEROUS SUPPORT: $5k → 14%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 14%INCARNATION PLACE: $5k → 14%INCARNATION PLACE: $10k → 14%Genesis Women's Shelter & Support: $4k → 14%INCARNATION PLACE: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 39 repeat orgs$6.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
27

Total granted

$1.3M
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+25%

Still filing today

85%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COMMONGOOD MEDICAL
    4× · 2018–2022 · $47k · revenue +375%
  • BB
    BROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND
    4× · 2018–2022 · $47k · revenue +319%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE BREAST NETWORK INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $45k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SF
    San Fransisco de Asisi Dallas
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
  • SA
    St Andrews Episcopal Church Farmers Branch
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • AF
    AMY FRIENDS DBA NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
2
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
3
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
4
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
5
The Center for Integrative Counseling and Psychology

Our mission is to provide accessible high-quality counseling, training, psychological evaluations, and educational testing that equip our clients to grow through lifes changes and challenges.

Health
6
Care Net Center of Greater Orleans

Pregnancy counseling

Unclassified
7
Elevate North Texas

Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…

Health
8
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
9
Healing to You

Healing to you provides mobile medical and mental health services to adults and children impacted by domestic violence and sexual assault. our goal is to close the gap in access to healthcare services to promote well being and heal the…

Health
10
Dallas Bethlehem Center Inc

Dallas Bethlehem Center supports families living in our South Dallas/Fair Park neighborhood through education, health & wellness programs and technology supports.

—
11
The Dallas County System of Services Inc

To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.

Human Services
12
Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Abide Womens Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/52
Grantees still filing
43/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Episcopal Foundation Of Dallas: $6,315,341 · ReligionEpiscopal Foundation Of DallasEpiscopal Diocese of Dallas: $310,000 · OtherEpiscopal Dio…Julia's Center for Healthcare: $79,000 · OtherJulia's Cente…ST JOHNS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $68,000 · OtherST JOHNS EPIS…BROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND: $47,000 · OtherSAMARITAN INN INC: $44,000 · OtherDME Exchange of Dallas Inc: $38,000 · OtherSan Fransisco de Asisi Dallas: $32,000 · Other+30 more: $333,427 · Other+30 moreCOMMONGOOD MEDICAL: $47,000 · HealthTHE BRIDGE BREAST NETWORK INC: $45,000 · HealthABIDE WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES: $38,000 · HealthVitamin Bridge: $23,000 · HealthHEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $22,500 · HealthHOPE CLINIC OF GARLAND INC: $20,000 · HealthHEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $17,000 · HealthNEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · HealthNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $10,500 · HealthMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesROSA ES ROJO INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesINCARNATION PLACE INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesDENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $17,500 · Human ServicesASCEND DALLAS: $15,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesChristian Works For Children Inc: $8,000 · Human Services+5 more: $22,000 · Human ServicesEXODUS MINISTRIES: $34,000 · Crime & LegalNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $18,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC: $17,000 · Crime & LegalTraffick911: $15,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY COMPASS: $12,000 · Crime & LegalCORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY: $38,000 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $30,500 · EducationPROMISE HOUSE INC: $44,000 · Housing & Shelter
Religion$6,315,341Other$951,427Health$245,500Human Services$170,500Crime & Legal$96,000Education$68,500Housing & Shelter$44,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMONGOOD MEDICAL: $47,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND: $47,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BRIDGE BREAST NETWORK INC: $45,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPROMISE HOUSE INC: $44,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN INN INC: $44,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetABIDE WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES: $38,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetCORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY: $38,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetDME Exchange of Dallas Inc: $38,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetEXODUS MINISTRIES: $34,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $30,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SUICIDE AND CRISIS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS: $30,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $29,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPEDIPLACE INC: $28,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROSA ES ROJO INC: $23,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetINCARNATION PLACE INC: $23,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetDENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVitamin Bridge: $23,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetHEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE CLINIC OF GARLAND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDALLAS LIFE INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $17,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC: $17,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $15,180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTraffick911: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetASCEND DALLAS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDCAREGROUP: $12,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY COMPASS: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE STEPS: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Works For Children Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALLEYS HOUSE: $7,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCenter for Survivors of Torture: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE'S DOOR NEW BEGINNING CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMOMMIES IN NEED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPOETIC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPLY GRACE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMaurice Barnett Geriatric Wellness Center Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAGDALEN HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…United Way of Metropo…W P & Bulah Luse Foun…Texas Women's Foundat…The Dallas FoundationHillcrest FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…The Rees-Jones Founda…Theodore and Beulah B…The Moody FoundationHoblitzelle FoundationRoy and Christine Stu…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX65.4× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc · The Moody Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas?

    Find your warmest path to Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home