Skip to content

· Private foundation

Easton Sports Development Foundation II

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
52
Grants FY2025still arriving
26
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$28MEducation$5.6MHuman Services$185kInternational$115kArts & Culture$102kCommunity Improvement$80kYouth Development$42kAnimals$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $303k
  • $250k+8 grants · $11M
$1,132
Median grant
26
States reached
$249M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$4,040,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$3,500,000
USA ARCHERY$850,000
NFAA FOUNDATION$576,250
CSUN FOUNDATION$500,000
USA CYCLING INC$480,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$445,000
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE$250,000
SOUTH DAKOTA GAME FISH & PARKS$100,000
SOUTH DAKOTA PARKS & WILDLIFE$100,000
PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION$52,758
BREAK THE BARRIERS$50,000
DATUS ARCHERY CLUB$40,000
ARCHERS USA FOUNDATION$40,000
PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $500 → 11%YMCA OF THE EAST VALLEY: $500 → 14%YMCA OF GREATER WHITTIER: $500 → 14%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $77k → 19%DARIEN YMCA: $500 → 9%YMCA OF NORTHERN UTAH: $500 → 8%TIERRA VILLAGE INC: $5k → 9%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $50k → 19%YMCA OF NORTHERN UTAH: $500 → 8%CITY OF REFUGE - CHICAGO: $500 → 14%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $39k → 19%YMCA OF NORTHERN UTAH: $500 → 8%YMCA OF NORTHERN UTAH: $500 → 8%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 60 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

60 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
131

Total granted

$24M
$811k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+46%

Still filing today

52%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $997k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $12M · revenue +72% · 67% of their budget
  • NA
    NATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE US
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +42%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • NI
    NATIONAL INTERSCHOLASTIC CYCLING ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $113k · revenue +134%
  • CB
    COLLEGE BASEBALL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $105k · revenue +199% · 54% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $105k · revenue +439%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
2
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

—
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Boy Scouts of America Sagamore Council 162

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—
8
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
9
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
10
Girl Scouts of Eastern Massachusetts Inc

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
11
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Northeast Texas; the most unlike its peers is Easton Sports Development Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 227 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
93/98
Grantees still filing
68/98
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $11,840,757 · PhilanthropyEASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE US: $6,310,214 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF…NATIONAL ARCHERY IN SCHOOLS PROGRAMS INC: $664,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ARCHERY IN SCHOOLS PRO…LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION: $500,315 · Recreation & SportsLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATIONUSA CYCLING INC: $480,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA CYCLING INC+8 more: $455,906 · Recreation & Sports+8 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,946,169 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $1,500,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIV…+32 more: $126,168 · EducationNFAA FOUNDATION: $1,948,373 · OtherNFAA FOUNDATI…US COLLEGE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $351,250 · OtherUS COLLEGE AR…OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE: $250,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA DEPA…+126 more: $1,075,441 · Other+126 moreBreak the Barriers Inc: $165,000 · Human Services+7 more: $11,902 · Human ServicesNATIONAL INTERSCHOLASTIC CYCLING ASSOCIATION: $112,500 · Youth DevelopmentBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $6,178 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STONEHAM INC: $5,000 · Youth Development+11 more: $18,897 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $105,263 · International
Philanthropy$11,841,257Recreation & Sports$8,410,435Education$5,572,337Other$3,625,064Human Services$176,902Youth Development$142,575International$105,263

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $11,840,757 over 7y, 67% of budgetNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE US: $6,310,214 over 9y, 22% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,946,169 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $1,500,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetNATIONAL ARCHERY IN SCHOOLS PROGRAMS INC: $664,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION: $500,315 over 3y, 13% of budgetUSA CYCLING INC: $480,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetARCHERS USA FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 4y, 65% of budgetBreak the Barriers Inc: $165,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetNATIONAL INTERSCHOLASTIC CYCLING ASSOCIATION: $112,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCOLLEGE BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $105,493 over 1y, 54% of budgetFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $105,263 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSCHOLASTIC ARCHERY ASSOCIATION CORPORATION: $50,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetWEST MICHIGAN ARCHERY CENTER: $40,652 over 4y, 16% of budgetCONEJO VALLEY ARCHERS INC: $25,451 over 2y, 26% of budgetPACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Youth Camps Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $8,058 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $7,276 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $6,714 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBuena Vista University: $6,558 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFERNANDO AWARD FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetWellesley College: $5,831 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STONEHAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIERRA VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFlorida Archery Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNAVAJO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY: $4,814 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $4,809 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC: $4,558 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL UNIVERSITY INC: $4,530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROLLINS COLLEGE: $4,521 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $4,385 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC CAPE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $4,343 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWilliams College: $4,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $3,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRoadrunner Archery Club: $3,619 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetMOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $3,485 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $3,253 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC: $3,046 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMount Saint Mary College: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT INC: $2,902 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $2,704 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $2,598 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 330 DANIEL WEBSTER COUNCIL INC: $2,549 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NJ: $2,515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2,513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $2,507 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND BREEZE MINISTRIES: $2,503 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE US ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARCHERY IN SCHOOLS PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds USA CYCLING INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCHERS USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Break the Barriers Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INTERSCHOLASTIC CYCLING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE BASEBALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER ARCHERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLASTIC ARCHERY ASSOCIATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST MICHIGAN ARCHERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONEJO VALLEY ARCHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Christian Youth Camps Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Girl Scouts of the United States of AmericaNY21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Girl Scouts of the United States of America · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · National Council of YMCAs of the USA · Bass Pro Shops & Cabelas Outdoor Fund · NRA Foundation Inc · Illumina Corporate Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · Td Charitable Foundation · California Community Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Easton Sports Development Foundation II funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Easton Sports Development Foundation II. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Meriden Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Club of Stoneham Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Southwest Florida Council Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Rollins College: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Easton Sports Development Foundation II?

Find your warmest path to Easton Sports Development Foundation II through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 227 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Easton Sports Development Foundation II’s filings →

More from the funding graph