Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

E & S Hirsch Foundation a Calif Nonprofit Public Ben Corp

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Environment$31kEducation$12kHealth$6kInternational$6kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$3kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$2kScience & Tech$2kOther$14k
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOLSA CHICA LAND TRUST$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
PARKINSONS MOVEMENT DISORDER FOUNDATION$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF LONG BEACH INC$600
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC$500
LOS CERRITOS WETLANDS LAND TRUST$500
SOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INC$500
OPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION$500
EARTHJUSTICE$500
BARE TRUTH INC$500
WETLANDS WILDLIFE CARE CENTER$500
DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$400
NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INTERVAL HOUSE: $300 → 10%BARE TRUTH INC: $600 → 14%INTERVAL HOUSE: $100 → 10%BARE TRUTH INC: $500 → 14%INTERVAL HOUSE: $100 → 10%BARE TRUTH INC: $500 → 14%Interval House: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
MO
VA
AZ
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 28% of E & S Hirsch Foundation a Calif Nonprofit Public Ben Corp’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 74% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

E & S Hirsch Foundation a Calif Nonprofit Public Ben Corplessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$64k · 33 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
12

Total granted

$64k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+2%

Still filing today

79%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHealthInternationalEducationArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +20%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +67%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • OC
    ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +105%
  • OC
    ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +52%
  • PA
    Parkensons and Movemnt Disorder Fnd
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
The 5 Gyres Institute

The 5 Gyres Institute (5 Gyres) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles, with a global network of supporters united in the pursuit of a planet free of plastic pollution. 5 Gyres' mission is to empower action against the…

5
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
6
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
7
Environmental Defense Center

The organization protects and enhances the local environment through education, advocacy and legal action.

Crime & Legal
8
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
9
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
12
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Children's Trust and the most unlike its peers is Captain Paul Watson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%34%35–55yr13%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%53%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%9%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,945

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
18/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOLSA CHICA LAND TRUST — $20,850 · EnvironmentBOLSA CHICA LAND TRUSTEARTHJUSTICE — $2,400 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICELos Cerritos Wetlands Land Trust — $2,250 · EnvironmentLos Cerritos Wetlands Land TrustNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,600 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $1,500 · Environment350ORG — $1,200 · Environment+2 more — $1,300 · EnvironmentSOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INC — $2,200 · OtherSOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INCIndividual grant recipient — $1,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKPFK PACIFICA FOUNDATION — $1,100 · OtherKPFK PACIFICA FOUNDATIONWETLANDS WILDLIFE CARE CENTER — $1,000 · OtherPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE — $1,000 · OtherParkensons and Movemnt Disorder Fnd — $1,000 · OtherAssistance League of Long Beach — $800 · OtherLAIST — $800 · OtherMOORE INSTITUTE FOR PLASTIC POLLUTION — $700 · OtherMeals on Wheels of Long Beach Inc — $2,200 · OtherMeals on Wheels of Long Beac…B A R E TRUTH — $1,600 · OtherB A R E TRUTHALGALITA MARINE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION — $1,500 · OtherALGALITA MARINE RESEARCH AND…+15 more — $4,400 · Other+15 moreORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION — $6,350 · EducationORANGE COUNTY SCH…ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS — $5,800 · EducationORANGE COUNTY SCH…THE PARKINSON'S & MOVEMENT DISORDER FOUNDATION — $3,000 · HealthOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION — $1,410 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $700 · HealthLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $700 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $4,300 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,023 · InternationalMercy Corps — $200 · InternationalCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $2,400 · AnimalsSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $750 · AnimalsDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureThe Art Theatre of Long Beach — $500 · Arts & Culture
Environment$31,100Other$20,000Education$12,150Health$5,810International$5,523Animals$3,150Arts & Culture$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOLSA CHICA LAND TRUST — $20,850 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION — $6,350 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS — $5,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $4,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARKINSON'S & MOVEMENT DISORDER FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLos Cerritos Wetlands Land Trust — $2,250 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Long Beach Inc — $2,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOLVE ME CFS INITIATIVE INC — $2,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetB A R E TRUTH — $1,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALGALITA MARINE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION — $1,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN MEDICINE FOUNDATION — $1,410 over 4y, 0.0% of budget350ORG — $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,023 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST — $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAssistance League of Long Beach — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERVAL HOUSE — $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPTAIN PAUL WATSON FOUNDATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Theatre of Long Beach — $500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE ACTION FAMILIES — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Corps — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PEACE CHORUS — $200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSoroptimist International of Long Beach — $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDollys Dream Home Rabbit Rescue — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Long Beach Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Porter John W Tuw · Bess J Hodges Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Sempra Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization E & S Hirsch Foundation a Calif Nonprofit Public Ben Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 47%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph