Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Drueding Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$588k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$216k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$2.1MHealth$1.2MHousing & Shelter$197kCrime & Legal$168kFood & Nutrition$131kRecreation & Sports$96kEmployment$79kPhilanthropy$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $162k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $211k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $216k
$6,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRUEDING CENTER$215,500
FOX CHASE INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH$44,000
THE STANFORD MEDICAL CENTER$30,000
THE FOUNDATION OF ST MARY'S HOSPITAL AT AMSTERDAM$20,000
GEMMA SERVICES$17,000
FRIENDSHIP WORKS INC$15,000
PHILADELPHIA CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$15,000
PENN HOSPITAL$10,000
MPN FOUNDATION$10,000
SOLUTIONS AT WORK INC$10,000
LANKENAU HOSPITAL$10,000
REYNA GROUP HOMES FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAY'S$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SUPPORT CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCATES$9,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OLD COLONY HOSPICE: $9k → 7%MYSTIC LEARNING CENTER INC: $5k → 8%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAY'S: $10k → 10%DRUEDING CENTER: $220k → 22%MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE: $10k → 17%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $9k → 9%OLD COLONY HOSPICE: $9k → 7%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $9k → 9%OLD COLONY HOSPICE: $9k → 7%DRUEDING CENTER: $216k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $9k → 9%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $7k → 6%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $7k → 9%OLD COLONY HOSPICE: $9k → 7%DRUEDING CENTER: $215k → 22%SNACK & FRIENDS: $8k → 17%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $7k → 6%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $7k → 9%SNACK & FRIENDS: $7k → 17%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $7k → 9%OLD COLONY HOSPICE: $9k → 7%DRUEDING CENTER: $182k → 22%FOOD FOR OTHERS: $6k → 6%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $7k → 9%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $6k → 9%OLD COLONY HOSPICE: $9k → 7%DREUDING CENTER: $173k → 22%OLD COLONY HOSPICE: $8k → 7%DREUDING CENTER: $171k → 22%OLD COLONY HOSPICE: $7k → 7%DREUDING CENTER: $159k → 22%DREUDING CENTER: $147k → 22%DREUDING CENTER: $136k → 22%GEMMA SERVICES: $17k → 7%GEMMA SERVICES: $15k → 7%GEMMA SERVICES: $15k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL: $10k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL: $8k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL: $8k → 7%SILVER SPRINGS MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL: $8k → 7%INTER-FAITH HOUSING ALLIANCE: $6k → 7%SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION (NOW PHILLY HOUSE): $18k → 22%PHILLY HOUSE: $7k → 22%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $9k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $9k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $8k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $7k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $7k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
KY
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.2M · 75 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

75 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
26

Total granted

$4.2M
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+3%

Still filing today

53%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalReligionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION OF ST MARY'S HEALTHCARE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $288k · revenue +39%
  • GS
    Gemma Services
    8× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +101%
  • FI
    FRIENDSHIPWORKS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • SB
    SUNDAY BREAKFAST MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • SF
    SUPPORT FOR CHILD ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $18k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
6
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
7
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
11
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
12
Mercy Catholic Medical Center of Southeastern Pennsylvania

We, trinity health of the mid-atlantic region and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy catholic medical center of southeastern…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foundation of St Mary's Healthcare and the most unlike its peers is Row La. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Community Food PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Youth CampsCommunity Arts CentersDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%6%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr15%37%35–55yr17%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr17%11%20–35yr15%26%35–55yr17%55%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/53
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,109

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
40/53
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DRUEDING CENTER — $1,618,276 · Human ServicesDRUEDING CENTERGemma Services — $85,500 · Human Services+13 more — $387,000 · Human Services+13 moreTHE FOUNDATION OF ST MARY'S HEALTHCARE — $288,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION OF ST MARY'S HEALTHCARETHE STANFORD MEDICAL CENTER — $140,000 · OtherTHE STANFORD MEDICAL CENTERLANKENAU HOSPITAL — $90,000 · OtherSOLUTIONS AT WORK INC — $78,500 · OtherMPN FOUNDATION — $72,500 · OtherHOLY REDEEMER HOSPICE — $61,000 · Other+63 more — $999,400 · Other+63 moreBrockton Hospital Inc — $53,000 · HealthREYNA GROUP HOMES FOUNDATION INC — $34,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $33,500 · HealthABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $29,000 · HealthNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $26,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $24,000 · HealthCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE — $20,500 · HealthCAMP NO WORRIES INC — $20,000 · HealthHOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM — $17,500 · Health+8 more — $36,200 · HealthSupport Center for Child Advocates — $116,050 · Crime & LegalPHILADELPHIA CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $23,000 · Crime & LegalFRIENDSHIPWORKS INC — $84,500 · ReligionSpecial Olympics Virginia Inc — $34,000 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR FUND — $26,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsSUNSHINE FOUNDATION — $60,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$2,090,776Other$1,729,400Health$294,200Crime & Legal$139,050Religion$84,500Recreation & Sports$62,000Philanthropy$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDRUEDING CENTER — $1,618,276 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF ST MARY'S HEALTHCARE — $288,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetSupport Center for Child Advocates — $116,050 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetGemma Services — $85,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIPWORKS INC — $84,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetOld Colony Hospice Inc — $69,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSUNSHINE FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC — $59,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBrockton Hospital Inc — $53,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPETER'S PLACE — $50,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetBETHESDA PROJECT — $47,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAMB CENTER — $44,900 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC — $39,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA — $39,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSNACK & FRIENDS INC — $36,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetREYNA GROUP HOMES FOUNDATION INC — $34,500 over 4y, 24% of budgetWEAVE INC — $34,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Virginia Inc — $34,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $33,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEXPRESSIVE PATH INC — $30,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $29,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $26,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $26,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION — $24,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $24,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $23,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE — $20,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP NO WORRIES INC — $20,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetMYSTIC LEARNING CENTER INC — $19,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDC SCORES — $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCO LAB THEATER GROUP INC — $11,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBOOK FOR HOPE INC — $10,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetPhilabundance — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Surry County Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR — $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe 124 Club — $8,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNDAY SUPPERS — $5,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUREPSP INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DRUEDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION OF ST MARY'S HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds Support Center for Child Advocates ↗
  • Who funds Gemma Services ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIPWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Old Colony Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Brockton Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds PETER'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMB CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR OTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA ↗
  • Who funds SNACK & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds REYNA GROUP HOMES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEAVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Virginia Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds EXPRESSIVE PATH INC ↗
  • Who funds ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…The Gordon Charter Fo…Henry Dolfinger 2 Tru…The Leo and Peggy Pie…Phillies Charities IncConnelly FoundationThe Cigna Group Found…United Way of Greater…W W Smith Charitable …Chubb Charitable Foun…Caroline Alexander Bu…Sanders Caroline J S …
The Philadelphia FoundationPA23.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · Phillies Charities Inc · Connelly Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Caroline Alexander Buck Foundation · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Drueding Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Mystic Learning Center Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Old Colony Hospice Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Brockton Hospital Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines