Skip to content
Douglas W & Wanda K Morgan Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Douglas W & Wanda K Morgan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$31kReligion$27kInternational$19kHealth$15kFood & Nutrition$6kArts & Culture$6kHousing & Shelter$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
13
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORAL MINISTRIES$6,300
COMPASSION$3,120
MOTHERS ON A MISSION INTL$3,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,600
RENFREW BAPTIST CHURCH$2,400
ARTISTS FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION$2,400
MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES$2,200
CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION ASSOCIATION$1,600
MERCY SHIPS$1,600
WORLD VISION$1,000
SMILE TRAIN$700
ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTECHINA$500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$500
WYNC$400
Individual grant recipient$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Hale County Meals On Wheels: $500 → 22%CLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH: $250 → 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $200 → 17%Ossining Food Pantry: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
OH
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 19 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
33

Total granted

$52k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+13%

Still filing today

63%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Compassion International Incorporated
    3× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +16%
  • MH
    MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +9%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CB
    Community Bible Church
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • LM
    Life Model Works Shepherds House
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • MO
    Mother on a Mission
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
6
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
7
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
8
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
9
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
10
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
11
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
12
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America; the most unlike its peers is Black Health Care Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/34
Grantees still filing
16/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Bible Church: $18,000 · OtherCommunity Bible ChurchADDICTIVE BEHAVIORAL MINISTRIES: $13,800 · OtherADDICTIVE BEHAVIORAL MINISTRIESLife Model Works Shepherds House: $11,250 · OtherLife Model Works Shepherds HouseMother on a Mission: $7,500 · OtherMother on a MissionChild Abuse Prevention Association: $5,000 · OtherChild Abuse Prevention AssociationRENFREW BAPTIST CHURCH: $3,400 · OtherMOTHERS ON A MISSION INT: $3,000 · OtherMOTHERS ON A MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 · Other+35 more: $18,619 · Other+35 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $8,620 · InternationalCompassion Int…WORLD VISION INC: $2,900 · InternationalWORLD VISION I…Mercy Ships International: $2,100 · InternationalMercy Ships In…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …+3 more: $900 · International+3 moreMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $2,300 · Human ServicesOssining Food Pantry: $2,000 · Human ServicesHALE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS: $500 · Human ServicesCLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH INC: $250 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $200 · Human ServicesARTISTS FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INTL: $4,800 · PhilanthropyInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $2,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,500 · ReligionCHURCHES OF CHRIST DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT INC: $1,000 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionHILLSIDE FOOD OUTREACH INC: $2,700 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $800 · Food & NutritionWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $304 · EducationCedarville University: $200 · EducationThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $150 · EducationMISSION TRAIL PTO INC: $50 · Education
Other$83,569International$15,520Human Services$5,250Philanthropy$4,800Religion$4,600Food & Nutrition$3,500Education$704

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARTISTS FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INTL: $4,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $2,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSIDE FOOD OUTREACH INC: $2,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOssining Food Pantry: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCHES OF CHRIST DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHALE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWHEN WE ALL VOTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAGABOND SCHOOL OF THE DRAMA INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $304 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBibles For The World: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION TRAIL PTO INC: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglas W & Wanda K Morgan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglas W & Wanda K Morgan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Douglas W & Wanda K Morgan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Douglas W & Wanda K Morgan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Douglas W & Wanda K Morgan’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home