· Private foundation
Douglas G Halliday Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ORLANDO CITY YOUTH SOCCER | $10,000 |
| NEW IMAGE YOUTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR SCPS | $10,000 |
| SMILE TRAIN | $5,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP | $5,000 |
| FOSTERING KINDNESS | $5,000 |
| NEW HOPE FOR KIDS | $5,000 |
| TUKUTANA | $5,000 |
| HEARTS HANDS AND HOPE | $5,000 |
| LITTLE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD | $5,000 |
| OCA INC | $5,000 |
| FOR KID'S SAKE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH | $5,000 |
| CENTRAL FLORIDA SOCCER CLUB | $5,000 |
| RMHC OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ASALTAMONTE SPRINGS ADVISORY BOARD7× · 2017–2024 · $123k · revenue +42%
- NINEW IMAGE YOUTH CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +345%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +145%
Funded once
- CHCHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $25k
- FPFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +238%
- ABABLAZE BOXING OUTREACH INCone grant, 2017 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide homes for disadvantaged children.
Do acts of kindness for the community.
A Childhood for Children, Inc. is organized to lessen childhood hunger, support education and the overall well-being of children in underserved communities by addressing, coordinating, and providing aid and relief, on a local and global…
Dinners for kids mission is to ensure that no child goes to bed on an empty stomach by providing prepared nutritious and balanced dinners to children in need. the program was designed to use vendors, commercial food service organizations…
Our organization helps families and children with tangible support throughout the year. Our funds go directly to providing food, clothing, basic living needs, backpacks and other things they need to help them get through their day. Each…
To create housing solutions, provide compassionate homeless day services, and work alongside partners to inspire community action.
Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.
The mission of the children's hope chest, inc. (chc) is to provide help and offer hope to children in our community suffering from poverty, abuse, neglect and illness. we strive to increase social action by promoting adult and youth…
Our mission is to provide homebound older adults with low income with nutritious food box delivery. Additionally, our food distribution program provides food to all in the communities we serve who need a helping hand. Our programs aim to…
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hope for Kids Inc and the most unlike its peers is Altamonte Springs Advisory Board. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALTAMONTE SPRINGS ADVISORY BOARD ↗
- Who funds NEW IMAGE YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTS HANDS & HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds FOR KIDS' SAKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds HELPFUL HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds Central Florida Soccer Club Inc ↗
- Who funds Fostering Kindness Corp ↗
- Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHRISTIAN SHARING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DORA COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds One Heart For Women and Children Inc ↗
- Who funds BAGS OF HOPE CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Acahand Foundation · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · Central Florida Foundation · Heart of Florida United Way Inc · Orlando Health Inc · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Douglas G Halliday Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Christian Sharing Center Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.