Skip to content
Douglas County Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Douglas County Community Foundation

Douglas County Community Foundation assists locally operating nonprofit organizations with financial grants organizational and operational guidance philanthropic promotion and many other capacities

$278k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$22kArts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$12kPhilanthropy$9kPublic Benefit$8kHuman Services$7kRecreation & Sports$5kAnimals$4k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $40,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $278,411 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $238,411 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Beyond the Badge$7,500
HRCA Backcountry$7,500
Nourish Meals on Wheels$5,000
Feel the Beat$5,000
Firefly Autism$5,000
Secor$5,000
Adams Camp$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 3%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CASTLE ROCK COMMUNITY INTER CHURCH TASK FORCE DBA HELP & HOPE CENTER: $3k → 3%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
2
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
3
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
4
Colorado Access Foundation
Health
5
Castle Rock Pride
Civil Rights
6
Denver Food Rescue

To reduce food waste and increase healthy food access with denver residents.

Food & Nutrition
7
Disability Services of Colorado

Provide assistance to children and adults with disabilities or special needs and their families.

Health
8
Boulder County Injured and Fallen Officer Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
9
Stronger Faster Boulder Co
Recreation & Sports
10
Colorado Ag Water Alliance

Works with farmers and ranchers to address water issues around the state impacting agriculture.

Environment
11
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
—
12
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Castle Rock Community Inter Church Task Force; the most unlike its peers is Highlands Ranch Backcountry Conservation and Education Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Lone Tree: $15,000 · OtherCity of Lone TreeBEYOND THE BADGE CO: $7,500 · OtherBEYOND THE BADGE CODOUGLAS COUNTY YOUTH EDUCATION AND SAFETY IN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherDOUGLAS COUNTY YOUTH EDUCATION AND SAFETY IN SCHO…COLORADO INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS INC: $5,000 · OtherCOLORADO INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS IN…Parker Task Force for Human Services: $1,500 · OtherColorado Agricultural Leadership Foundation Inc: $1,750 · OtherCASTLE ROCK SENIOR CENTER INC: $1,500 · Other+1 more: $130 · OtherCRISIS CENTER: $5,000 · HealthCRISIS CENTERAGING RESOURCES OF DOUGLAS COUNTY: $5,000 · HealthAGING RESOURCES OF DOU…ALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM: $5,000 · HealthALTA VISTA CENTER FOR …NAMI Arapahoe-Douglas Counties: $1,700 · HealthNAMI Arapahoe-Douglas …SECOR: $6,500 · Food & NutritionSECORNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $5,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISH MEALS O…HIGHLANDS RANCH BACKCOUNTRY CONSERVATION AND EDUCATION FUND: $7,500 · PhilanthropyHIGHLANDS R…Douglas County Community Foundation: $1,000 · PhilanthropyDouglas Cou…FEEL THE BEAT CORP: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3,885 · AnimalsCASTLE ROCK COMMUNITY INTER CHURCH TASK FORCE: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$37,380Health$16,700Food & Nutrition$11,500Philanthropy$8,500Arts & Culture$5,000Animals$3,885Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOR: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY YOUTH EDUCATION AND SAFETY IN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCRISIS CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAGING RESOURCES OF DOUGLAS COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFEEL THE BEAT CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3,885 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLE ROCK COMMUNITY INTER CHURCH TASK FORCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Agricultural Leadership Foundation Inc: $1,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNAMI Arapahoe-Douglas Counties: $1,700 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetParker Task Force for Human Services: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASTLE ROCK SENIOR CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDouglas County Community Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Mile High United Way …The Denver FoundationWestern Union Foundat…Core Electric Coopera…Libertygives Foundati…Daniels FundLillis FoundationPortercare Adventist …Av Hunter Trust Incor…Anschutz Family Found…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO27.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Denver Foundation · Western Union Foundation · Core Electric Cooperative · Libertygives Foundation · Daniels Fund · Lillis Foundation · Portercare Adventist Health System · Av Hunter Trust Incorporated · Anschutz Family Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglas County Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglas County Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Douglas County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home