Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Portercare Adventist Health System

Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation and all its subsidiary organizations were established by the Seventh-Day Adventist Church to bring a ministry of healing and health to the communities served.

$534k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$3.8MEducation$801kHuman Services$554kHousing & Shelter$373kCommunity Improvement$301kFood & Nutrition$271kReligion$197kCrime & Legal$98kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $270,618 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $534,227 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $263,609 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $249k
$17,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES$47,850
DOCTORS CARE$42,000
MID-AMERICA UNION CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS$30,000
SECOR$22,500
NEWDAY ADVENTIST CHURCH$22,000
COLORADO CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PATIENT SAFETY$20,000
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC$17,000
GOFARM$15,000
NOURISH COLORADO$13,000
MILE HIGH ACADEMY INC$10,000
ABBAS CHILD GRIEF SUPPORT INC$10,000
Rocky Mountain Adventist Healthcare Foundation$7,768
PARKER TASK FORCE FOR HUMAN SERVICES$7,500
DONOR ALLIANCE INC$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $495k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%ABBAS CHILD GRIEF SUPPORT INC: $10k → 3%THE PLACE: $28k → 9%THE PLACE: $28k → 9%FRONT RANGE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER: $26k → 10%SOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $35k → 12%LATINA SAFEHOUSE INITIATIVE: $11k → 12%CASTLE ROCK COMMUNITY INTER-CHURCH TASK FORCE DBA DOUGLAS ELBERT TASK FORCE: $8k → 3%DOUGLAS ELBERT TASK FORCE: $8k → 3%PARA TI MUJER: $26k → 7%Seasoned With Grace Unboxed: $75k → 12%SOLID ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $19k → 9%PROJECT WORTHMORE: $35k → 8%TRI-LAKES CARES: $18k → 9%PROJECT WORTHMORE: $26k → 8%SECOND CHANCE THROUGH FAITH: $18k → 9%SECOND CHANCE THROUGH FAITH: $11k → 9%TREELINE PASS: $39k → 8%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $32k → 12%MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS: $24k → 12%SUN VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $21k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
IL
NY
SD
CA
CO
NE
MO
KS
GA

Grants abroad, by region — $220k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$99k · 45% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Mission Trips

South America$55k · 25% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Mission Trips

South Asia$54k · 25% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Mission Trips

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$12k · 5% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Mission Trips

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.1M · 46 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

46 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
61

Total granted

$5.1M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+13%

Still filing today

85%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +208%
  • DC
    DOCTORS CARE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $576k · revenue +21%
  • UC
    UNION COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $305k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • SW
    SEASONED WITH GRACE UNBOXED
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue +358% · 97% of their budget
  • LR
    LA RAZA SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $61k · revenue +37%
  • DC
    DOUGLAS COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Digital Health

Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.

Health
2
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
3
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
4
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
6
Healthier Colorado

Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…

Health
7
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
8
Colorado Behavioral Healthcare Council

Cbhc's mission is to support community resilience, guide behavioral health innovation, and enhance individual well-being throughout colorado by supporting colorado's community behavioral health safety net providers.

Health
9
Summitstone Health Partners

SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…

Health
10
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
11
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
12
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeffco Action Center Inc the Action Center and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Health Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional Association Ne…Residential Recovery & Beha…Food Security & Hunger Reli…Arts & Culture EducationAffordable Housing Developm…Developmental Disabilities …International Christian Out…Youth Academic SupportDog and Cat RescueEarly Childhood Montessori …Environmental Advocacy Orga…Regional Business ChambersCommunity Health Care Netwo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%1%<5yr15%14%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr11%52%35–55yr13%14%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/111
the rest of the field
14%
2,971/21,365

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
96/97
Grantees still filing
64/97
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES — $1,184,434 · HealthCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICESRocky Mountain Adventist Healthcare Foundation — $904,698 · HealthRocky Mountain Adventist Healthcare FoundationDOCTORS CARE — $576,107 · HealthDOCTORS CARECOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE — $226,462 · HealthCOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE+18 more — $482,819 · Health+18 moreMILE HIGH ADVENTIST ACADEMY — $286,388 · OtherMILE HIGH ADVENTIST ACADE…ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS — $103,230 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN CONFERENCE…LA RAZA SERVICES INC — $61,250 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INC — $61,250 · OtherNEW DANCE THEATRE INC — $60,452 · OtherFRIENDS OF BROOMFIELD INC — $52,500 · Other+40 more — $868,702 · Other+40 moreSEASONED WITH GRACE UNBOXED — $75,000 · Human ServicesSEASONED …PROJECT WORTHMORE — $61,250 · Human ServicesPROJECT W…The Place — $56,000 · Human ServicesThe PlaceTREELINE PASS INC — $38,815 · Human ServicesTREELINE …SOLID ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION — $38,500 · Human ServicesSOLID ROC…SOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN …FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $31,500 · Human ServicesFOCUS POI…SECOND CHANCE THROUGH FAITH — $28,000 · Human ServicesPara Ti Mujer — $26,250 · Human ServicesFront Range Area Health Education Center — $26,250 · Human ServicesMERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS — $23,570 · Human ServicesSUN VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER — $21,000 · Human Services+5 more — $70,500 · Human Services+5 moreUNION COLLEGE — $305,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACK — $35,000 · EducationRISE COLORADO — $26,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $10,500 · EducationSECOR — $100,000 · Food & NutritionHUNGER FREE COLORADO — $54,821 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $48,500 · Food & NutritionFront Line Farming — $35,000 · Food & NutritionROCKY MOUNTAIN SEED ALLIANCE INC — $17,500 · Food & NutritionCOAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS — $17,500 · Food & NutritionGoFarm — $15,000 · Food & NutritionVuela for Health — $49,666 · Community ImprovementCenter for African American Health — $43,750 · Community ImprovementCommunity Compassion Outreach — $35,000 · Community ImprovementCASTLE ROCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $30,000 · Community ImprovementMOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER — $24,686 · Community ImprovementCOLORADO CHANGEMAKERS COLLECTIVE — $24,500 · Community ImprovementPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $17,500 · Community ImprovementDowntown Business Association of Louisville Inc — $11,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $10,500 · Community ImprovementLITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $131,550 · PhilanthropyDOUGLAS COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $60,000 · PhilanthropyBARTON INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ACTION — $17,500 · PhilanthropyWESTERN WELCOME WEEK INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Health$3,374,520Other$1,493,772Human Services$531,635Education$401,750Food & Nutrition$288,321Community Improvement$246,602Philanthropy$219,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES — $1,184,434 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRocky Mountain Adventist Healthcare Foundation — $904,698 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetDOCTORS CARE — $576,107 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetUNION COLLEGE — $305,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE — $226,462 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetLITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $131,550 over 2y, 14% of budgetSECOR — $100,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetSEASONED WITH GRACE UNBOXED — $75,000 over 1y, 97% of budgetNOURISH COLORADO — $64,867 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPROJECT WORTHMORE — $61,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHeart Mind Haven — $61,250 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $61,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA RAZA SERVICES INC — $61,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $60,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW DANCE THEATRE INC — $60,452 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDOUGLAS COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Place — $56,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHUNGER FREE COLORADO — $54,821 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BROOMFIELD INC — $52,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVuela for Health — $49,666 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $48,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPOSADA — $47,250 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCenter for African American Health — $43,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFINNEY COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION INC — $42,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetTREELINE PASS INC — $38,815 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBROTHER JEFF'S CULTURAL CENTER — $38,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetSOLID ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION — $38,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFront Line Farming — $35,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCommunity Compassion Outreach — $35,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetMUSLIM YOUTH FOR POSITIVE IMPACT — $35,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVive — $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROSE ANDOM CENTER INC — $35,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION — $32,585 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHIGHLANDS RANCH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC — $31,667 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $31,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $31,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN COLORADO AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER — $31,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCASTLE ROCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $30,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSIDE BY SIDE CORP — $29,750 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetPeer Coach Academy Colorado — $28,375 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSECOND CHANCE THROUGH FAITH — $28,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetPIKES PEAK JUSTICE & PRO BONO CENTER — $28,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHomeward Pikes Peak — $28,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOULDER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $26,650 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPara Ti Mujer — $26,250 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetRISE COLORADO — $26,250 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Health Initi…The Colorado Health F…Colorado Gives Founda…The Denver FoundationRose Community Founda…Mile High United Way …Anschutz Family Found…Trailhead InstituteNextfifty InitiativeThe Colorado TrustCaring for Denver Fou…El Pomar Foundation
Catholic Health Initiatives ColoradoAZ75.2× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado · The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Anschutz Family Foundation · Trailhead Institute · Nextfifty Initiative · The Colorado Trust · Caring for Denver Foundation · El Pomar Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Portercare Adventist Health System funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Northwest Medical Foundation Tillamook — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
44report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Portercare Adventist Health System?

Find your warmest path to Portercare Adventist Health System through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home