· Public charity
Disabling Barriers
DISABLING BARRIERS serves the physical and mental health of children and young adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities living in southern colorado by providing grants to fill unmet needs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $456k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NURSING AND THERAPY SERVICES OF COL | $162,938 |
| THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION | $140,400 |
| WIDEFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT 3 | $111,246 |
| GRIFFITHS CENTER PASA | $100,000 |
| OUR HOUSE | $100,000 |
| FAMILY VOICES COLORADO | $91,639 |
| PEAK PARENT CENTER | $80,937 |
| KIWANIS MONUMENT CLUB | $76,187 |
| THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE | $75,000 |
| COLORADO SPRINGS DISTRICT11 | $70,367 |
| CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE INC | $65,000 |
| ADAPTIVE SPORTS CENTER | $61,000 |
| DISABILITY SERVICES INC ENVIDA | $50,000 |
| CHUCKIE'S PLACE-REIGNING HOPE | $50,000 |
| FEEL THE BEAT CORP | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $892k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $638k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANursing and Therapy Services of Colorado3× · 2022–2024 · $415k · revenue +83%
- TATHE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION4× · 2021–2024 · $377k · revenue +30%
- CPCHUCKIES PLACE3× · 2021–2024 · $210k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- HRHilltop Ranchone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +21% · 39% of their budget
- TLTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $65k
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADOgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Arc of West Central Colorado is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations…
To advocate for social justice for people with all types of disabilities.
The organization was incorporated in 1952 to provide Educational, Social and Therapeutic programs and related activities for persons with Cerebral Palsy and other disabilities, as well as research aimed at preventing Cerebral Palsy.
To promote the full inclusion and integration of people with all types of disabilities into all levels of society.
The arc of colorado provides individual and systems change advocacy for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (idd) residing in colorado and their families.
Provide assistance to children and adults with disabilities or special needs and their families.
To change the lives of people with disabilities by promoting their physical, psychological and social well-being through equine-assisted activities.
SWCI provides supports and training for local members of the disability and aging communities to live the lives they want in Southwest Colorado.
Adeo provides support for all major life activities for adults livingwith the residual impact of a brain injury by providing a place to callhome and services that promote physical, behavioral and emotional wellness,opportunities for…
The autism society of colorado's mission is to create connections, empowering everyone in the autism community with the resource they need, when they need them. asc's vision is to create a world where everyone in the autism community is…
We empower adults with disabilities to lead fulfilling lives. We are committed to creating a community where all people are valued and accepted.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Connections Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Club 21. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Nursing and Therapy Services of Colorado ↗
- Who funds THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHUCKIES PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VOICES COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc ↗
- Who funds IN COLORADO INITIATIVE FOR INCLUSIVE HIGHER EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Special Kids-Special Families Inc ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Spina Bifida Association of Colorado ↗
- Who funds TRAILHEAD INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FEEL THE BEAT CORP ↗
- Who funds GRIFFITH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds Hilltop Ranch ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ALTA VISTA CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds PEAK PARENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Monument Hill Service Club ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF SOUTHWEST COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Independence Inc ↗
- Who funds LOCKWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO ↗
- Who funds COLORADO DISCOVER ABILITY ↗
- Who funds AINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds DISABLED SPORTS USA - ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Goodwill of Colorado ↗
- Who funds SIX POINTS EVALUATION AND TRAINING INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds HARMONY ACRES EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds Colorado Springs Independence Center ↗
- Who funds COLO SPGS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds TALL TALES RANCH ↗
- Who funds FISHING HAS NO BOUNDARIES INC ↗
- Who funds MESA DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Daniels Fund · Pikes Peak United Way · Developmental Pathways Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Disabling Barriers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Options Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Disabling Barriers?
Find your warmest path to Disabling Barriers through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.