· Private foundation
Direct Supply Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k45 grants · $101k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $183k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE | $39,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $27,000 |
| MILWAUKEE WORLD FESTIVAL INC | $22,636 |
| HUNGER TASK FORCE OF MILWAUKEE INC | $17,500 |
| SERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC | $15,000 |
| MELANIN MINDED FOUNDATION | $14,000 |
| HAVENWOODS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP | $13,500 |
| COMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC | $12,000 |
| SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC | $12,000 |
| NORTHCOTT NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE | $10,000 |
| MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING | $9,000 |
| SAFE & SOUND INC | $5,500 |
| STEM FORWARD INC | $5,500 |
| AGELESS AVIATION DREAMS FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| GATHERING OF SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
108 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 60 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $176k · revenue +21%- MWMILWAUKEE WORLD FESTIVAL INC7× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +34%
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $82k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- CVCURE VIOLENCE GLOBALone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -14%
- LFLCS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -28%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIREone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.
To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.
The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…
Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…
The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.
The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…
To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…
To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.
We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cj Lomas Recovery Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
127 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 127 of the 201 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE WORLD FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds HAVENWOODS NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Safe & Sound Inc ↗
- Who funds AGELESS AVIATION DREAMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER SPRING NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Revitalize Milwaukee Inc ↗
- Who funds STEM FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SERVING OLDER ADULTS OF SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds GATHERING OF SOUTHEAST WI INC ↗
- Who funds EISENHOWER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RAISING THE BAR INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHCOTT NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PROJECTS COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds ERAS SENIOR NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds FRESH COAST CLASSIC INC ↗
- Who funds LCS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Direct Supply Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc — 40% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Direct Supply Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Direct Supply Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.