Skip to content
Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club at a glance

· Public charity

Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club

To promote fellowship and companionship among and for its membership; to offer its members the opportunity to participate in community service and charitable projects; to provide entertainment recreational and travel opportunities; and to provide an atmosphere of social exchange within its membership.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rowland Elementary Kindergarden$1,000
McKinleys CHildren Center 2nd donation$1,000
Foster Love$1,000
LA County Sheriffs Dept$1,000
Get on The Bus$1,000
Diamond Bar High School$1,000
East San Gabriel Valley Japanese Center$1,000
Chritian Service$1,000
Pomona Food Bank$1,000
Diamond Bar Friends of the Library$1,000
Children s Youth and Family Ministry$1,000
Diamond Bar Friends of the Library 2nd Donation$1,000
Get on the BUs 2nd donation$1,000
Aging Next$1,000
Rowland Elementary Cultural Prog$1,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%House of Ruth 2nd donation: $1k → 14%House of Ruth: $1k → 14%Aging Next: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Miracle House Foundation

Mentorship and housing assistant for women returning from incarceration

Human Services
2
Women Strenghtening Women

Charitable Benevolence Outreach

Community Improvement
3
Inland Empire Rescue Mission Inc

Serve the least, the last and lost in the Inland Empire

—
4
Genesis Sober Living Inc

Provide residential recovery housing to those who are in recovery from drug and alcohol use and, in many cases, homeless

Health
5
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
6
Downtown Women's Center

Housing, employment, and physical and mental health services for women overcoming homelessness and poverty.

Human Services
7
Central Valley Feed the Homeless

Provide a safe space for homeless to be fed/do laundry/take showers and provide job search help and transportation to necessary appointments provede bus tickets for stranded people who come for drug treatment and have no resources to get…

Food & Nutrition
8
Dignity Village

To provide shelter and resources

Human Services
9
Volunteer Center of San Gabriel Valley

Provide referrals for court mandated community service. offer meal delivery for home bound individuals.

Philanthropy
10
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
12
Meals On Wheels-Santa Maria Valley Inc

Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foothill Family Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Diamond Bar Friends of the Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
5/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

John A Rowland HS: $3,000 · OtherJohn A Rowland HSWALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2,000 · OtherWALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSHERIFFS' RELIEF FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherSHERIFFS' RELIEF FOUNDATIONFOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INC: $1,000 · OtherFOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INCDiamond Bar Breakfst Lions Club: $1,000 · OtherDiamond Bar Breakfst Lions ClubMEALS ON WHEELS - INDUSTRY INC: $1,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS - INDUSTRY INCDA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $1,000 · OtherDA CENTER FOR THE ARTSChildren s Youth and Family Ministry: $1,000 · OtherChildren s Youth and Family MinistryST DENIS CHURCH: $1,000 · OtherST DENIS CHURCHMOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICTGOD PROVIDES MINISTRY: $1,000 · OtherGOD PROVIDES MINISTRYDIVAS IN POWER: $1,000 · OtherDIVAS IN POWERTOGETHER WE RISE: $1,000 · OtherTOGETHER WE RISECenter for Restorative Justice Works: $2,000 · HealthCenter for Restorat…McKinley Children's Center Inc: $2,000 · HealthMcKinley Children's…Emanate Health Foundation: $1,000 · HealthEmanate Health Foun…HOUSE OF RUTH INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF RU…AGINGNEXT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesAGINGNEXT I…Diamond Bar Friends of The Library: $2,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF INDUSTRY SHERIFF STATION: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEAST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWHITTIER PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Religion
Other$16,000Health$5,000Human Services$3,000Philanthropy$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMcKinley Children's Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGINGNEXT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHITTIER PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS - INDUSTRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDIVAS IN POWER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shelter Partnership I…The Ahmanson Foundati…California Community …Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sempra FoundationThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Shelter Partnership IncCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shelter Partnership Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sempra Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home