Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club

To promote fellowship and companionship among and for its membership; to offer its members the opportunity to participate in community service and charitable projects; to provide entertainment recreational and travel opportunities; and to provide an atmosphere of social exchange within its membership.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
McKinley CHildrens Center$1,000
John A Rowland HS$1,000
Diamond Bar Friends of the Library 2nd Donation$1,000
Rowland Elementary Cultural Prog$1,000
The DA Center for the Arts$1,000
Emanate Health Foundation$1,000
Diamond Bar HS CHoir$1,000
Rowland Elementary Kindergarden$1,000
Children s Youth and Family Ministry$1,000
Foster Love$1,000
LA County Sheriffs Dept$1,000
Get on The Bus$1,000
Diamond Bar High School$1,000
East San Gabriel Valley Japanese Center$1,000
Chritian Service$1,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%House of Ruth: $1k → 14%House of Ruth 2nd donation: $1k → 14%Aging Next: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Miracle House Foundation

Mentorship and housing assistant for women returning from incarceration

Human Services
2
Women Strenghtening Women

Charitable Benevolence Outreach

Community Improvement
3
Inland Empire Rescue Mission Inc

Serve the least, the last and lost in the Inland Empire

—
4
Genesis Sober Living Inc

Provide residential recovery housing to those who are in recovery from drug and alcohol use and, in many cases, homeless

Health
5
Union Station Homeless Services

We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.

Human Services
6
Downtown Women's Center

Housing, employment, and physical and mental health services for women overcoming homelessness and poverty.

Human Services
7
Central Valley Feed the Homeless

Provide a safe space for homeless to be fed/do laundry/take showers and provide job search help and transportation to necessary appointments provede bus tickets for stranded people who come for drug treatment and have no resources to get…

Food & Nutrition
8
Dignity Village

To provide shelter and resources

Human Services
9
Volunteer Center of San Gabriel Valley

Provide referrals for court mandated community service. offer meal delivery for home bound individuals.

Philanthropy
10
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Oxnard Homeless Prevntion
Human Services
12
Meals On Wheels-Santa Maria Valley Inc

Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foothill Family Shelter Inc and the most unlike its peers is Diamond Bar Friends of the Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
5/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

John A Rowland HS — $3,000 · OtherJohn A Rowland HSWALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $2,000 · OtherWALNUT VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSHERIFFS' RELIEF FOUNDATION — $1,000 · OtherSHERIFFS' RELIEF FOUNDATIONDiamond Bar Breakfst Lions Club — $1,000 · OtherDiamond Bar Breakfst Lions ClubFOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INC — $1,000 · OtherFOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INCMEALS ON WHEELS - INDUSTRY INC — $1,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS - INDUSTRY INCDA CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $1,000 · OtherDA CENTER FOR THE ARTSChildren s Youth and Family Ministry — $1,000 · OtherChildren s Youth and Family MinistryST DENIS CHURCH — $1,000 · OtherST DENIS CHURCHMOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $1,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICTGOD PROVIDES MINISTRY — $1,000 · OtherGOD PROVIDES MINISTRYDIVAS IN POWER — $1,000 · OtherDIVAS IN POWERTOGETHER WE RISE — $1,000 · OtherTOGETHER WE RISECenter for Restorative Justice Works — $2,000 · HealthCenter for Restorat…McKinley Children's Center Inc — $2,000 · HealthMcKinley Children's…Emanate Health Foundation — $1,000 · HealthEmanate Health Foun…HOUSE OF RUTH INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF RU…AGINGNEXT INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesAGINGNEXT I…Diamond Bar Friends of The Library — $2,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF INDUSTRY SHERIFF STATION — $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEAST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureWHITTIER PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $1,000 · Religion
Other$16,000Health$5,000Human Services$3,000Philanthropy$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,000Arts & Culture$1,000Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMcKinley Children's Center Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGINGNEXT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITTIER PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS - INDUSTRY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDIVAS IN POWER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shelter Partnership I…The Ahmanson Foundati…California Community …Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sempra FoundationThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Shelter Partnership IncCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shelter Partnership Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sempra Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Diamond Bar Senior Citizens Club funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home