· Community foundation
Denver Post Community Foundation
To improve and enrich life through support of programs that benefit children, the arts, literature and education, and the provision of basic human services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 55 grants below total $1,630,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,669,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k51 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k4 grants · $406k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Denver Kids Inc | $140,000 |
| Tennyson Center for Children | $130,000 |
| Colorado UpLift | $85,000 |
| Griffith Centers for Children Inc | $50,500 |
| Food Bank of the Rockies | $40,000 |
| Colorado Dream Foundation | $39,500 |
| Project Angel Heart | $35,000 |
| YESS Institute | $35,000 |
| Colorado Youth for a Change | $34,500 |
| Save Our Youth | $34,500 |
| Kids in Need of Dentistry | $34,500 |
| We Don't Waste | $30,000 |
| Volunteers of America Colorado Branch | $30,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Denver | $30,000 |
| Kids First Health Care | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
75 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DKDENVER KIDS INC8× · 2018–2025 · $945k · revenue +33%
- FBFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES8× · 2018–2025 · $340k · revenue +68%
- TYThe YESS Institute7× · 2019–2025 · $325k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- MDMETROPOLITAN DENVER HOMELESS INITIATIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +142%
THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTERone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +14%- DMDENVER METRO CHAMBER LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To empower low-income families and individuals towards self-sufficiency and independent living.
The denver police activities league's (pal) mission is to create strong communities by providing under-resourced children with opportunities, exposure, and experiences with the intent of changing young people's lives in a positive way.
To promote and provide a continuum of human services to youth and their families.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
The colorado children's campaign relentlessly champions the needs of children. we leverage data, research, and relationships to unapologetically advocate for kids, fighting for a brighter, more equitable future for every child in colorado.…
To support college students in innovative, affordable paths to in-demand careers and financial freedom.
The vision of denver's early childhood council (the "council") is that denver is a community where the diverse needs of all children and their families are supported. the council elevates the early childhood field through innovative and…
The attainment network builds networks that transform education-to-workforce systems, erase persistent and pervasive equity gaps, expand opportunities for learners, and meet the economic demands for a highly skilled and educated workforce.
Invest in kids partners with local communities to ensure the success of evidence-based programs that improve the health and well-being of colorado's youngest children and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DENVER KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN AT COLORADO CHRISTIAN HOME ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds The YESS Institute ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds HUNGER FREE COLORADO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds WEDONTWASTE INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN NEED OF DENTISTRY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing ↗
- Who funds COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE ↗
- Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS FIRST HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds METRO CARING ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds WARREN VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds THE DELORES PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN PEAK DENVER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds Colorado Coalition for the Homeless ↗
- Who funds Children's Literacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds JUDI'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds DOCTORS CARE ↗
- Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · The Denver Children's Foundation · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Rose Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Denver Post Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Denver Post Community Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Denver Post Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.