Skip to content
Dehayes Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dehayes Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$449kHuman Services$48kHealth$19kEducation$17kHousing & Shelter$16kAnimals$9kFood & Nutrition$9kInternational$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$405k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$11,500
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,030
SAVE THE CHILDREN$5,000
NORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC$1,000
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$1,000
CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS$500
Individual grant recipient$150
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$100
AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION FBO SARAH B HAYES$10
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN'S SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 9%MIDDLE WAY HOUSE: $4k → 18%ASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $11k → 11%MIDDLE WAY HOUSE: $4k → 18%ASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $9k → 11%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $2k → 14%ASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 11%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $350 → 14%ASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 11%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $200 → 14%WHEELER MISSION: $6k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
IN
OH
CT
CA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 9 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$63k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+17%

Still filing today

78%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesInternationalAnimalsHealthCrime & LegalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
    4× · 2020–2023 · $24k · revenue +39%
  • WM
    WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $12k · revenue +9%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $550 · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • GF
    GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • GL
    GOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
2
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
3
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
4
Women First Inc

Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women and girls in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

International
5
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
6
Healthwise Incorporated

The healthwise mission is to help people make better health decisions.

Health
7
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
10
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Services of Westchester Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $442,975 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+2 more: $3,572 · PhilanthropyASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $24,300 · Human ServicesASHLAND C…WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesWHEELER M…MIDDLE WAY HOUSE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesMIDDLE WA…LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $2,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,550 · Human ServicesSALVATION ARMY: $12,000 · OtherSALVATION A…LAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $11,500 · OtherLAKE FOREST…GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $8,000 · OtherGLEANERS FO…ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5,030 · OtherST JUDES CH…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,875 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $2,875 · OtherUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $2,000 · OtherCHALLENGE DAY FUND: $5,000 · OtherCHALLENGE D…GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $2,563 · Other+8 more: $5,350 · Other+8 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,750 · InternationalTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC: $3,750 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,000 · International+1 more: $100 · InternationalThe Balance Project Inc: $5,000 · HealthHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $4,350 · HealthCATS HAVEN LTD: $6,300 · AnimalsWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $1,000 · AnimalsGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INC: $6,000 · Employment
Philanthropy$446,547Human Services$47,850Other$57,193International$13,600Health$9,350Animals$7,300Employment$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $442,975 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $24,300 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $11,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLE WAY HOUSE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATS HAVEN LTD: $6,300 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Balance Project Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCHALLENGE DAY FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION: $4,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Indianapolis Inc: $2,572 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $2,563 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SAGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN - CHICAGO INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncAbbVie FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…
Lilly Endowment IncIN14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dehayes Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dehayes Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dehayes Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home