· Private foundation
Dehayes Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $11,500 |
| ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $5,030 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN | $1,000 |
| NORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC | $1,000 |
| CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $100 |
| AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION FBO SARAH B HAYES | $10 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING4× · 2020–2023 · $24k · revenue +39%
- WMWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC2× · 2020–2021 · $12k · revenue +9%
- CTCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC2× · 2022–2023 · $550 · revenue +36%
Funded once
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2020 · $12k
- GFGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INCone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +11%
- GLGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…
To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…
The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…
Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women and girls in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.
Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…
The healthwise mission is to help people make better health decisions.
To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Family Services of Westchester Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE WAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds CATS HAVEN LTD ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGE DAY FUND ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Balance Project Inc ↗
- Who funds HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND ↗
- Who funds NORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC ↗
- Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds HAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SAGE INC ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN - CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dehayes Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.