Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Dechomai Foundation Inc

National donor advised fund that receives, manages, and liquidates non-cash asset contributions and provides charitable gift annuities.

$498M
Granted FY2024still arriving
89
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$136M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

77% of Dechomai Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 50 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

19
’20
18
’21
52
’22
30
’23
50
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$1.7BHealth$159MReligion$24MHuman Services$21MEducation$18MArts & Culture$8.7MScience & Tech$5.3MEnvironment$4.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 89 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $285k
  • $50k–250k25 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+53 grants · $495M
$308,891
Median grant
27
States reached
$169M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAFgiving360$135,972,633
Santa Barbara Foundation$72,342,078
Arc Research Institute$70,094,690
National Philanthropic Trust$31,150,506
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund$29,753,308
Vanguard Charitable$28,852,313
Goldman Sachs Philanthropic Fund$21,893,644
Bank of America Charitable Fund$19,207,838
Mass General Brigham Incorporatd$9,835,742
Jewish Communal Fund$8,826,793
Reka Darida Foundation$7,469,393
Hendricks County Community Foundation$6,557,981
The Chicago Community Foundation$5,680,512
Impact Assets$4,543,849
Hope 1413 Foundation Inc$4,474,848
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $20.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ECHOZ: $12k → 14%The Roots of Progress: $250k → 8%IMPACT COMMUNITY CENTER: $150k → 15%The Night Ministry: $25k → 14%Edward Charles Foundation: $19.3M → 14%Georgia's Friends Inc: $50k → 8%American Red Cross: $212k → 14%American National Red Cross: $91k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$161M · 20 repeat orgs$97M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
86

Total granted

$161M
$57M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+18%

Still filing today

80%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    Arc Research Institute
    2× · 2022–2024 · $135M · revenue +27% · 67% of their budget
  • CP
    CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +118% · 53% of their budget
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • EC
    EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $19M · revenue +31% · 37% of their budget
  • WF
    WORTHLESS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M · revenue -86% · 72% of their budget
  • SG
    St George Churchgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3.6M · revenue +179%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
5
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
8
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Zemplin Mosaic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Health Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsSenior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Jewish Community Organizati…Community Arts CentersCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%8%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%59%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/201
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,364

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

170 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 170 of the 202 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
167/170
Grantees still filing
105/170
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $459,551,932 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $241,008,373 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATIONGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $184,111,736 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INCVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $130,103,489 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $74,809,629 · PhilanthropySANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $72,342,078 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $69,085,521 · Philanthropy+55 more — $194,270,143 · Philanthropy+55 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $253,551,611 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVES…+1 more — $10,000 · Community ImprovementArc Research Institute — $135,094,730 · HealthArc Resea…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED & AFFILIATES GROUP RETURN — $9,835,742 · HealthMASS GENE…+10 more — $12,685,104 · Health+10 moreCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,680,512 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS — $5,344,250 · OtherRAYMOND JAMES TRUST — $2,222,122 · OtherReka Darida Foundation — $7,469,393 · OtherWORTHLESS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000,000 · OtherSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE — $2,148,759 · OtherFLORIDA ACHIEVEMENT SUPPORT TRUST — $1,825,081 · Other+65 more — $20,580,710 · OtherEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $19,327,009 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $887,800 · Human Services+6 more — $789,524 · Human ServicesServant Foundation — $12,759,135 · ReligionSt George Church — $3,622,462 · Religion+6 more — $667,932 · ReligionPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $1,878,940 · EducationWilliam Marsh Rice University — $1,143,755 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $1,123,250 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $1,094,323 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $1,013,704 · EducationLA SALLE UNIVERSITY — $873,719 · EducationVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC — $799,183 · EducationCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY — $700,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $650,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $559,995 · Education+26 more — $5,001,456 · Education
Philanthropy$1,425,282,901Community Improvement$253,561,611Health$157,615,576Other$50,270,827Human Services$21,004,333Religion$17,049,529Education$14,838,325

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $459,551,932 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $253,551,611 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $241,008,373 over 5y, 12% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $184,111,736 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetArc Research Institute — $135,094,730 over 2y, 67% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $130,103,489 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $74,809,629 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $72,342,078 over 1y, 60% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $69,085,521 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $39,911,501 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $20,641,336 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $19,327,009 over 1y, 37% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $18,106,577 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetServant Foundation — $12,759,135 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $12,140,601 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $11,563,819 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,752,292 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED & AFFILIATES GROUP RETURN — $9,835,742 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $8,826,793 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,531,439 over 1y, 20% of budgetReka Darida Foundation — $7,469,393 over 1y, 55% of budgetHENDRICKS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $6,569,284 over 2y, 54% of budgetBNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $6,157,810 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $5,155,985 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWORTHLESS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetTHE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST — $4,503,485 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $4,030,458 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC — $3,975,000 over 3y, 53% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $3,687,531 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,882,610 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetStifel Charitable Inc — $2,852,074 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetVISION WALKERS COLLECTIVE INC — $2,500,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetKAZILIONIS CHARITABLE FUND — $2,407,280 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHRIVENT CHARITABLE IMPACT & INVESTING — $2,185,103 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE — $2,148,759 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetTHE ELEVATE PRIZE FOUNDATION INC — $2,060,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $1,962,214 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $1,878,940 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFLORIDA ACHIEVEMENT SUPPORT TRUST — $1,825,081 over 2y, 52% of budgetGreater Horizons — $1,815,196 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC — $1,688,850 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetNETA FOUNDATION — $1,650,068 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,545,729 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCalifornia YIMBY — $1,250,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING — $1,144,412 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $1,143,755 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FINDLAY-HANCOCK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,130,741 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $1,123,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dechomai Asset TrustTiaa Charitable IncThe Bessemer Giving F…Charlottesville Area …California Community …T Rowe Price Program …The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Ayco Charitable F…The Community Foundat…American Gift FundGiveClear FoundationBny Mellon Charitable…
Dechomai Asset TrustFL24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dechomai Asset Trust · Tiaa Charitable Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · American Gift Fund · GiveClear Foundation · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dechomai Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • American Hiking Society — 14% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Blair Academy — 0% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dechomai Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dechomai Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 202 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines