Skip to content
de Compiegne-Wallace Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

de Compiegne-Wallace Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$403kHuman Services$220kHealth$217kArts & Culture$183kRecreation & Sports$90k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $133k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER$83,333
MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$50,000
EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL$33,334
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$832k · 8 repeat orgs$280k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$832k
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-40%
-9%

Still filing today

88%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $167k · revenue -47%
  • MP
    MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $113k · revenue +21%
  • EH
    EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k

Funded once

  • TS
    Trinity School
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • PS
    Presbyterian School
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • TV
    The Village at Manor Park
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midland School Corporation

Midland school provides a distinctive co-educational boarding school experience to a diverse student body in grades 9-12. through study and work, midland teaches the value of a lifetime of learning, self-reliance, simplicity,…

Education
2
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
3
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
4
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
5
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
Midland Festival Ballet

Midland festival ballet is a 501(c)3 nonprofit whose mission is to promote and present the art of classical ballet through education, performance, and outreach.

Arts & Culture
7
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
Meridian Health Services Corp

To help make our communities healthier through a focus on whole person health.

Health
10
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
11
The Parenting Cottage

The vision of the parenting cottage is to build a strong community by first building strong families. the vision is implemented through the delivery of program services, adhering to the agency's mission statement of providing hope,…

Human Services
12
Permian Basin Petroleum Museum Library and Hall of Fame

We will share the petroleum and energy story and its impact on our lives.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland Community Theatre Inc; the most unlike its peers is Presbyterian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOLSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $100,000 · OtherSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASINTrinity School: $50,000 · OtherTrinity SchoolMIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherMIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONThe Village at Manor Park: $40,000 · OtherThe Village at Manor ParkTHE VILLAGE CENTER AT MANOR PARK: $25,000 · OtherTHE VILLAGE CENTER AT MANOR PARKMissouri Veteran's Endeavor: $25,000 · OtherMissouri Veteran's EndeavorMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC: $112,500 · EducationMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INCMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATIO…Presbyterian School: $40,000 · EducationPresbyterian SchoolPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $166,666 · HealthPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL…HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $70,000 · HealthHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH…MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND COMMUNITY …THE SANTA FE OPERA: $82,500 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERACITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsMISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR: $25,000 · Human Services
Other$390,000Education$252,500Health$236,666Arts & Culture$182,500Recreation & Sports$25,000Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPERMIAN BASIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $166,666 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC: $112,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $82,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPresbyterian School: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR: $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scharbauer Foundation…Abell-Hanger Foundati…Paul and Katherine Mo…Chaparral FoundationYarborough FoundationBeal FoundationFmh FoundationThe Henry FoundationPermian Basin Area Fo…Hl Brown Jr Family Fo…John and Maurine Cox …Helen Greathouse Char…
Scharbauer Foundation IncTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · Chaparral Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · Beal Foundation · Fmh Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Hl Brown Jr Family Foundation · John and Maurine Cox Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization de Compiegne-Wallace Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from de Compiegne-Wallace Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on de Compiegne-Wallace’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home