Skip to content
Dayton Foundation Plus Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Dayton Foundation Plus Inc

Dayton foundation plus, inc.

$51M
Granted FY2025still arriving
231
Grants FY2025still arriving
23
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$37MPublic Benefit$18MEducation$16MCivil Rights$15MFood & Nutrition$13MPhilanthropy$9.9MHuman Services$8.4MArts & Culture$8.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 231 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 231 grants below total $46,615,811, the rows itemized in this filing. The $51,289,171 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,673,360 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $170k
  • $10k–50k111 grants · $2.1M
  • $50k–250k47 grants · $5.0M
  • $250k+49 grants · $39M
$26,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$437M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$3,328,500
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$3,101,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$2,819,999
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU LAW$2,000,000
STATE VOICES$1,800,000
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$1,650,000
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER$1,280,000
CITY HARVEST INC$1,250,000
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND$1,250,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$1,152,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$1,002,500
NEO PHILANTHROPY$1,000,000
UPWARDLY GLOBAL$1,000,000
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC$900,000
ABOUT FRESH$890,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIDES CENTER: $150k → 10%PROJECT MOTHERPATH INC: $175k → 28%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $100k → 14%PREBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $500k → 11%TIDES CENTER: $75k → 10%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $50k → 14%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $50k → 17%THE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $50k → 9%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $25k → 17%SAFE HORIZON INC: $125k → 17%IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE: $528k → 16%IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE: $400k → 16%IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE: $332k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $659k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $383k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $333k → 16%HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $23k → 14%4C FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 16%ACTION FOR BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $100k → 16%HOMEFULL: $55k → 14%HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH: $600k → 17%HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH: $600k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $750k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $750k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $750k → 17%OMEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $225k → 14%OMEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $125k → 14%OMEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $100k → 14%OMEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50k → 14%OMEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50k → 14%ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER: $25k → 14%OMEGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $45k → 14%CLOTHES THAT WORK: $50k → 14%CLOTHES THAT WORK: $25k → 14%CLOTHES THAT WORK: $25k → 14%HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST: $22k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES: $72k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES: $55k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES: $50k → 14%DAYBREAK: $41k → 14%DAYBREAK: $36k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES: $32k → 14%DAYBREAK: $31k → 14%DAYBREAK: $30k → 14%DAYBREAK: $30k → 14%GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE: $29k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES: $26k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL SERVICES: $26k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137M · 297 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

297 repeat relationships: 167 still active in FY2025, 130 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

297
181

Total granted

$137M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

79%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7.5M · revenue +16%
  • SV
    STATE VOICES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7.3M · revenue +23%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7.1M · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • BC
    BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU LAW
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M
  • UT
    UNITED TEEN EQUALITY CENTER AKA UTEC
    one grant, 2023 · $775k
  • FR
    FLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION
    one grant, 2024 · $700k · revenue 0% · 26% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Democracy Collaborative Foundation Inc

See schedule othe democracy collaborative was established in 2000 to advance understanding of democracy for the 21st century and to promote emerging strategies and innovations in community development that enhance democratic life. in…

Education
2
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
3
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
4
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
5
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
9
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
10
Democracy Works Inc

The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.

Civil Rights
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Opportunity Agenda Inc; the most unlike its peers is Home Is the Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

435 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 435 of the 556 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
81
Early backer (in before they grew)
429/435
Grantees still filing
249/435
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $9,698,500 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VI…MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2,368,200 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,240,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc: $4,250,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy IncTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $2,858,988 · OtherUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $2,300,000 · Other+90 more: $30,683,544 · Other+90 moreSTATE VOICES: $7,280,000 · Civil RightsSTATE VOICESAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $7,101,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBE…NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $3,160,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE…National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $1,200,000 · Civil RightsA HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC: $1,100,000 · Civil RightsVOTERIDERS: $1,050,000 · Civil Rights+13 more: $4,490,000 · Civil Rights+13 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $7,506,666 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $4,166,840 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX …BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $3,612,000 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CEN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,345,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD…INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH EQUITY RESEARCH EVALUATION AND POLICY: $1,200,000 · Health+15 more: $4,089,899 · Health+15 moreWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $3,500,000 · EducationWILLIAM J…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,953,000 · EducationICAHN SCH…University of Dayton: $1,586,453 · EducationUniversit…CAREMESSAGE: $1,260,000 · EducationCAREMESSA…Wright State University Foundation Inc: $523,600 · Education+15 more: $3,152,333 · Education+15 moreSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $3,200,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY…THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2,250,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOC…COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $1,375,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC: $1,260,000 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT…HIP HOP Public Health Inc: $1,200,000 · Human ServicesHIP HOP P…Omega Community Development Corporation: $615,000 · Human ServicesPREBLE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $500,000 · Human Services+10 more: $1,569,000 · Human Services+10 moreABOUT FRESH INC: $4,090,000 · Food & NutritionABOUT FRE…CITY HARVEST INC: $3,750,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARV…Brighter Bites Inc: $1,330,000 · Food & NutritionBrighter …Feeding America: $1,125,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding A…PREBLE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $600,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOODBANK INC: $457,800 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $569,700 · Food & NutritionDAYTON HISTORY: $903,610 · Arts & CultureTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $837,095 · Arts & CultureMIAMI VALLEY PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $806,820 · Arts & CultureDayton Performing Arts Alliance: $742,200 · Arts & CultureVICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $684,000 · Arts & CultureAviation Heritage Foundation Inc: $491,200 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DAYTON: $490,500 · Arts & CultureThe Human Race Inc: $420,500 · Arts & CultureMOSAIC INSTITUTE OF GREATER DAYTON: $371,000 · Arts & CultureMONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL INC: $250,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more: $1,458,170 · Arts & Culture
Other$54,399,232Civil Rights$25,381,000Health$23,920,905Education$11,975,386Human Services$11,969,000Food & Nutrition$11,922,500Arts & Culture$7,455,095

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $7,506,666 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE VOICES: $7,280,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $7,101,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $4,250,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $4,166,840 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetABOUT FRESH INC: $4,090,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $3,750,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $3,612,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $3,500,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,345,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $3,200,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $3,160,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $2,858,988 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2,368,200 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $2,300,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2,250,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,240,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,953,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $1,586,453 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUTEC Inc: $1,412,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $1,375,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetBrighter Bites Inc: $1,330,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetIMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC: $1,260,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetCAREMESSAGE: $1,260,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetUNDERSTOOD FOR ALL INC: $1,250,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHIP HOP Public Health Inc: $1,200,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTH EQUITY RESEARCH EVALUATION AND POLICY: $1,200,000 over 2y, 56% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $1,200,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFeeding America: $1,125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA HEALTHIER DEMOCRACY INC: $1,100,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetVOTERIDERS: $1,050,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $975,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON: $962,750 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetHIAS INC: $960,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $950,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetDAYTON HISTORY: $903,610 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $837,095 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $806,820 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetDRIVE CHANGE INC: $755,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetDayton Performing Arts Alliance: $742,200 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetFLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION: $700,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetVICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $684,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC: $675,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetOUR FARM SANCTUARY: $665,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetDAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $659,350 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE TROY FOUNDATION: $650,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetKINGS BAY YM-YWHA INC: $630,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetALL VOTING IS LOCAL: $625,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Mathile Family Founda…The United Way of the…The Dayton Power and …Virginia W Kettering …Miami Valley HospitalLevin Family Foundati…The Berry Family Foun…The CareSource Founda…Iddings Benevolent Tr…Frank M Tait Foundati…
The Dayton FoundationOH205.1× affinity163 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Mathile Family Foundation · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · Miami Valley Hospital · Levin Family Foundation · The Berry Family Foundation · The CareSource Foundation · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · Frank M Tait Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dayton Foundation Plus Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dayton Foundation Plus Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Utec Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp: 32% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Action for Boston Community Development Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Boston Community Pediatrics Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dayton Foundation Plus Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dayton Foundation Plus Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 556 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dayton Foundation Plus’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home