· Private foundation
Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k51 grants · $964k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $390k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAYTON PERFORMING ARTS ALLIANCE | $165,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $75,000 |
| DAYTON ART INSTITUTE | $75,000 |
| DAYTON LIVE (FORMERLY VICTORIA THEATRE | $75,000 |
| DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE CO | $40,000 |
| FOODBANK INC | $35,000 |
| YWCA OF DAYTON | $35,000 |
| GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE | $35,000 |
| GREATER DAYTON PUBLIC TELEVISION | $30,000 |
| DAYBREAK | $30,000 |
| ARTEMIS CENTERALTERNATIVES | $30,000 |
| YMCA DAYTON | $30,000 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY | $30,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIAL | $30,000 |
| VIOLENCE FREE FUTURES | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $808k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
81 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY7× · 2017–2024 · $285k · revenue +21%
- YDYWCA Dayton6× · 2019–2024 · $285k · revenue +10%
- GNGOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE7× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- SVST VINCENT DE PAULone grant, 2017 · $60k
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MIAMIone grant, 2017 · $35k
- HOHOUSE OF BREADone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote community by nuturing children and empowering familites in a christian environment by providing childcare services and supportive services for families.
The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
Greater dayton union cooperative initiative inc incubates cooperative businesses to create and retain good jobs in our region, building a local economy that works for all.
Our mission is to foster fair and substantive debates that encourage participation in our democracy, and our vision is of a stronger Ohio, with well informed voters and highly qualified public servants, candidates, and elected officials.
The Equity Center exists to empower collaboratives that revive communities.
The center will use its resources for information sharing and member assistance to incubate new entrepreneurs who are trying to establish a presence in the marketplace. the center will research, identify, teach and disseminate the critical…
The League of Women Voters provides nonpartisan educational voter information regarding political issues and candidates.
United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.
Grace Urban Development GUD is a non-profit agency located in the City of Dayton, Ohio that operates exclusively for improving the quality of life of people through community economic development, housing development, and job training. GUD…
Promoting volunteerism, developing the potential of women, and improving the community through effective action and leadership of trained volunteers.
Dayton realtors serves its members as a resource for continuing education, a wide range of committee activities, the multiple listing service, social events, products, and publications.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dayton Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Shango Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dayton Performing Arts Alliance ↗
- Who funds THE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds YWCA Dayton ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds DAYBREAK INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Dayton Public Television dba Think TV ↗
- Who funds CLOTHES THAT WORK ↗
- Who funds THE MUSE MACHINE INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCARE OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds Kids in New Directions ↗
- Who funds Wesley Community Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BRIGID'S PATH INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL EASTER SEALS MIAMI VALLEY ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS ↗
- Who funds K12 GALLERY FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds Contemporary Dayton Inc ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Western Ohio ↗
- Who funds We Care Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DAYTON ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds HANNAH'S TREASURE CHEST ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY MEALS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · Kettering Family Foundation · Levin Family Foundation · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · The CareSource Foundation · The Berry Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.