Skip to content

· Private foundation

Danvera Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$379k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.2MRecreation & Sports$374kYouth Development$285kCrime & Legal$41kHuman Services$14kInternational$13kAnimals$12kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $239k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$110,000
PLAYWORKS$77,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OAKLAND$51,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$45,000
ST PATRICK'S SCHOOL$40,000
ST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
ST AUGUSTINE HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
FIRST TEE OF OAKLAND$5,206
LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN$5,163
CHILDREN'S FAIRYLAND$5,000
ST TERESA CHURCH$2,563
URBAN LEAGUE$2,500
ALAMEDA COUNTY FOOD BANK$1,280
ST VINCENT DAY HOME$1,113
100 HOLE HIKE FOR YOUTH ON COURSE$1,053
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST PATRICK'S SCHOOL: $40k → 8%ST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 11%UCLA FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%ST PATRICK'S SCHOOL: $25k → 8%ST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 10%LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 11%UCLA FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%ST PATRICK'S SCHOOL: $15k → 8%ST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 10%LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 11%UCLA FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%ST PATRICK'S SCHOOL: $11k → 8%ST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 10%LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 11%UCLA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 10%LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 10%ST AUGUSTINE HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 11%UCLA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 10%LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $6k → 10%UCLA FOUNDATION: $45k → 14%PLAYWORKS: $78k → 10%LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $118k → 11%PLAYWORKS: $60k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $110k → 11%PLAYWORKS: $60k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $100k → 11%PLAYWORKS: $51k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $81k → 11%PLAYWORKS: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $62k → 11%PLAYWORKS: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $60k → 11%CHILDREN'S FAIRYLAND: $5k → 10%CHILDREN'S FAIRYLAND: $5k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE: $3k → 10%REBUILDING TOGETHER EAST BAY: $3k → 10%FIRST TEE OF OAKLAND: $5k → 10%ALAMEDA COUNTY FOOD BANK: $3k → 10%ST TERESA CHURCH: $3k → 10%ST TERESA CHURCH: $3k → 10%ST TERESA CHURCH: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
IA
PA
CA
UT
NE
VA
MD
AR
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 25 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
11

Total granted

$1.6M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+23%

Still filing today

56%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsCrime & LegalInternationalYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $530k · revenue +42%
  • LS
    LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $41k · revenue +79%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • RO
    RESTORE OAKLAND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
5
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
6
Parks California

As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.

Environment
7
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
The Oakland Public Education Fund

The oakland public education fund leads the development and investment of community resources in oakland public schools so that all students can learn, grow, and thrive.

Education
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
12
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rebuilding Together East Bay Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $530,035 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OAKLAND: $285,257 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OAKLANDST AUGUSTINES SCHOOL OF: $95,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINES SCHOOL OFST PATRICK'S SCHOOL: $91,036 · OtherST PATRICK'S SCHOOLST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherST MARY'S COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL+27 more: $73,774 · Other+27 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $370,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $348,370 · Youth DevelopmentPLAYWORKS EDUCATION …LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $41,319 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $1,070 · Crime & LegalOakland Childrens Fairyland Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsOakland Parks and Recreation Foundation: $7,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $523 · Recreation & SportsCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $5,060 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $8,000 · Animals
Other$1,165,102Education$370,000Youth Development$348,370Crime & Legal$42,389Recreation & Sports$17,523International$8,060Animals$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $530,035 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $370,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $348,370 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $41,319 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,371 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOakland Childrens Fairyland Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOakland Parks and Recreation Foundation: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEast Bay Agency for Children: $5,771 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLAND: $5,178 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $5,060 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRebuilding Together East Bay Network: $3,723 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENTS DAY HOME: $3,138 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPALONG ANIMAL RESCUE: $3,060 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE OAKLAND INC: $1,070 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $156 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Childrens Fairyland Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Parks and Recreation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds East Bay Agency for Children ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together East Bay Network ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENTS DAY HOME ↗
  • Who funds HOPALONG ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE OAKLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA20.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Impactassetsinc · The Barrios Trust · Nia Community Foundation · The Zellerbach Family Foundation · Sunlight Giving · The California Endowment · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Danvera Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Danvera Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Danvera’s filings →

    More from the funding graph