Skip to content
Crossroads Community Services Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Crossroads Community Services Inc

We use a collaborative approach to revolutionize the pantry distribution model through food equity research, client-centered services, and community partner engagement.

$19M
Granted FY2022
120
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Food & Nutrition$10MHealth$122kHousing & Shelter$15kYouth Development$9k
02FY2022 · 120 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 120 grants below total $10,243,806, the rows itemized in this filing. The $19,235,607 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,991,801 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k12 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k54 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k48 grants · $4.7M
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.0M
$43,155
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Crossroads Community Services Pantry$1,668,251
Catholic Charities of Dallas$991,524
Chocolate Mint Foundation$403,015
Dallas Bethlehem Center$367,987
Harmony Community Dev Corp$308,193
The Stewpot C&Y$281,701
Dallas Leadership Foundation$227,396
Mission Oak Cliff$224,086
Mighty Ministries$217,377
Salvation Army Oak Cliff$209,320
Royal Haven Baptist Church$209,320
Transition to Transformation$155,004
Friendship West Faith Formula Human Services$152,699
Mutual Association Of Men & Women$137,537
Masters Harvest$128,357
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Essential Foundation: $8k → 9%Metropolitan Dream Center: $92k → 14%Community Outreach Connection: $54k → 14%Cedar Hill Shares: $70k → 14%CYFS Inc: $60k → 14%Interfaith Family Services: $29k → 14%Grand Prairie Co-Op: $22k → 14%Catholic Charities of Dallas: $992k → 14%VNA Meals on Wheels: $84k → 14%Duncanville Outreach Ministry: $52k → 14%For Oak Cliff: $107k → 14%Sharing Life Community Outreach Inc: $78k → 14%Sharing Life Community Outreach Inc: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

6%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$618k · 4 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +64% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 107 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$618k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+64%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesReligionEducationHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    Harmony Community Development Corporation
    5× · 2020–2025 · $315k · revenue +31%
  • US
    UT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $122k · revenue +17%
  • SL
    SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $108k · revenue +225%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Dallas
    one grant, 2020 · $73k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dallas Food Pantry

North Dallas Food Pantry (DBA NTX Community Food Pantry) is dedicated to building relationships by sharing resources, hope and faith in a welcoming environment, with love and dignaty.

Human Services
2
Bread for Our Children

Provide nutrition meals for communities in the Dallas/Ft Worth, Texas areas

—
3
Under the Bridge Ministries Inc

We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…

Human Services
4
Gods Pantry

God's Pantry exists to extend a helping hand, to the needy, by providing food to anyone who is facing circumstances beyond their control. The pantry serves all people, with respect and compassion, allowing them to maintain their…

Food & Nutrition
5
Eastside Ministries of Ft Worth

As a 501 (c) 3 organization that was incorporated in 1981 to provide free food and clothing to unhoused and underserved individuals and families on the east side of Fort Worth without discrimination.

Human Services
6
Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County

A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.

—
7
Pleasant Grove Food Pantry Inc

Pleasant Grove Food Pantry provides nutritious food to qualified residents of Pleasant Grove in southeast Dallas who are food insecure. Fighting food insecurity is the mission and intent of the organization. Services are provided by…

Food & Nutrition
8
Fighting Homelessness

Fighting Homelessness is a Christ-centered ministry dedicated to uncovering and addressing the root causes of homelessness in Dallas. We believe every person is created in the image of God and deserves dignity, compassion, hope, and the…

Human Services
9
Household of Faith Arlington Charities

To provide temporary assistance to needy families and individuals in tarrant county

Human Services
10
Hearts Full of Love

to share Jesus with those we minister to regardless of social status by first meeting their physical needs and, through that relationship, meeting their spiritual needs.

Human Services
11
Consolation Community Outreach

Consoation Commnity Outreach main purpose is to feed low income and poor families, we also provide them with daily needed essentials for free.

Human Services
12
Texoma Family Shelter

Texoma Family Shelter emplowers homeless families and individuals to achieve self sufficiency by providing safe lodging meals and case managment during extended stays. See Sch O

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sharing Life Community Outreach Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tr Salvation Army-Staunton Ua H. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/56
Grantees still filing
35/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DALLAS BETHLEHEM CENTER INC: $367,987 · OtherDALLAS BETHLEHEM CENTER INCHarmony Community Development Corporation: $314,593 · OtherHarmony Community Development CorporationBAPTIST GENERAL CONVENTION OF TEXAS: $286,167 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF DALLAS: $281,701 · OtherMIGHTY MINISTRIES INC: $217,377 · OtherTR SALVATION ARMY-STAUNTON UA H: $209,320 · Other+84 more: $4,177,958 · Other+84 moreCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,668,251 · Food & NutritionCROSSROADS COMMUNI…DESOTO FOOD PANTRY INC: $94,232 · Food & NutritionDESOTO FOOD PANTRY…CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $991,524 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIE…SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $108,191 · Human ServicesSHARING LIFE COMM…FOR OAK CLIFF: $106,634 · Human ServicesFOR OAK CLIFFMETROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER INC: $92,253 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN DREA…MEALS ON WHEELS SENIOR SERVICES: $84,272 · Human ServicesCedar Hill Shares Inc: $70,268 · Human ServicesCYFS INC: $59,833 · Human Services+5 more: $165,675 · Human Services+5 moreCHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDATION: $403,015 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS COVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $109,145 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDSHIP WEST FAITH FORMULA: $152,699 · ReligionMASTERS HARVEST: $128,357 · ReligionSOUL FOR CHRIST MINISTRY: $48,331 · ReligionVoice of Hope Ministries Inc: $38,248 · Religion+1 more: $9,810 · ReligionDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $227,396 · Public BenefitARTS MISSION OAK CLIFF: $224,086 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,855,103Food & Nutrition$1,762,483Human Services$1,678,650Youth Development$512,160Religion$377,445Public Benefit$227,396Arts & Culture$224,086

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,668,251 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $991,524 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDATION: $403,015 over 4y, 14% of budgetDALLAS BETHLEHEM CENTER INC: $367,987 over 4y, 48% of budgetHarmony Community Development Corporation: $314,593 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $227,396 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTR SALVATION ARMY-STAUNTON UA H: $209,320 over 1y, 27% of budgetIRVING SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $176,002 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS: $122,184 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetKIDS COVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $109,145 over 4y, 15% of budgetSHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $108,191 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOR OAK CLIFF: $106,634 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER INC: $92,253 over 4y, 66% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SENIOR SERVICES: $84,272 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $73,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas: $72,963 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCedar Hill Shares Inc: $70,268 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetCYFS INC: $59,833 over 3y, 22% of budgetDuncanville Outreach Ministry: $52,360 over 4y, 34% of budgetSOUL FOR CHRIST MINISTRY: $48,331 over 4y, 14% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $43,369 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVoice of Hope Ministries Inc: $38,248 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetHomeward Bound Inc: $30,047 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $28,693 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOLDEN GATE ADULT REHABILILITION MINESTRY: $27,454 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetGRACE PLACE PROPERTIES INC: $22,473 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetChris Howell Foundation: $21,471 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $17,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE CROSSROADS ACADEMY: $15,316 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Health: $10,355 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CONFERENCE: $9,810 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetTyler Street Manor Inc: $9,396 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRAINBOW DAYS INC: $9,289 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTRINITY BASIN PREPARATORY INC: $8,714 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetImperial Food Services Inc: $8,497 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetGRAND PRAIRIE UNITED CHARITES INC: $6,666 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSHARED HOUSING CENTER INC: $5,137 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
  • Who funds CHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BETHLEHEM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Community Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTS MISSION OAK CLIFF ↗
  • Who funds TR SALVATION ARMY-STAUNTON UA H ↗
  • Who funds IRVING SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP WEST FAITH FORMULA ↗
  • Who funds MASTERS HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds UT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS ↗
  • Who funds KIDS COVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR OAK CLIFF ↗
  • Who funds DESOTO FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SENIOR SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds University of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds Cedar Hill Shares Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropo…Communities Foundatio…The Dallas FoundationNorth Texas Food BankHillcrest FoundationW P & Bulah Luse Foun…The Rees-Jones Founda…Texas Women's Foundat…Dallas Mavericks Foun…Hoblitzelle FoundationBaron & Blue Foundati…World Vision Inc
United Way of Metropolitan Dallas IncTX41.9× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · North Texas Food Bank · Hillcrest Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Dallas Mavericks Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Baron & Blue Foundation · World Vision Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crossroads Community Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crossroads Community Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $26M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crossroads Community Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home