· Public charity
Crossroads Community Services Inc
We use a collaborative approach to revolutionize the pantry distribution model through food equity research, client-centered services, and community partner engagement.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 120 grants below total $10,243,806 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $19,235,607 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,991,801 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k12 grants · $93k
- $10k–50k54 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k48 grants · $4.7M
- $250k+6 grants · $4.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Crossroads Community Services Pantry | $1,668,251 |
| Catholic Charities of Dallas | $991,524 |
| Chocolate Mint Foundation | $403,015 |
| Dallas Bethlehem Center | $367,987 |
| Harmony Community Dev Corp | $308,193 |
| The Stewpot C&Y | $281,701 |
| Dallas Leadership Foundation | $227,396 |
| Mission Oak Cliff | $224,086 |
| Mighty Ministries | $217,377 |
| Salvation Army Oak Cliff | $209,320 |
| Royal Haven Baptist Church | $209,320 |
| Transition to Transformation | $155,004 |
| Friendship West Faith Formula Human Services | $152,699 |
| Mutual Association Of Men & Women | $137,537 |
| Masters Harvest | $128,357 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 107 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHarmony Community Development Corporation5× · 2020–2025 · $315k · revenue +31%
- USUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS4× · 2019–2022 · $122k · revenue +17%
- SLSHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC2× · 2019–2020 · $108k · revenue +150%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Dallasone grant, 2020 · $73k · revenue +22%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
North Dallas Food Pantry (DBA NTX Community Food Pantry) is dedicated to building relationships by sharing resources, hope and faith in a welcoming environment, with love and dignaty.
Provide nutrition meals for communities in the Dallas/Ft Worth, Texas areas
We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…
God's Pantry exists to extend a helping hand, to the needy, by providing food to anyone who is facing circumstances beyond their control. The pantry serves all people, with respect and compassion, allowing them to maintain their…
As a 501 (c) 3 organization that was incorporated in 1981 to provide free food and clothing to unhoused and underserved individuals and families on the east side of Fort Worth without discrimination.
A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.
Pleasant Grove Food Pantry provides nutritious food to qualified residents of Pleasant Grove in southeast Dallas who are food insecure. Fighting food insecurity is the mission and intent of the organization. Services are provided by…
To provide temporary assistance to needy families and individuals in tarrant county
Consoation Commnity Outreach main purpose is to feed low income and poor families, we also provide them with daily needed essentials for free.
to share Jesus with those we minister to regardless of social status by first meeting their physical needs and, through that relationship, meeting their spiritual needs.
Community lifeline center envisions a community where all of our neighbors are provided resources to overcome temporary adversity. we can achieve this vision by focusing on our mission to provide residents of collin county with basic…
To improve the quality of life for residents in the South Dallas / Fair Park community by providing programs and services that help people break out of the cycle of poverty and empower them to become contributing members of their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sharing Life Community Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tr Salvation Army-Staunton Ua H. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds CHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS BETHLEHEM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Harmony Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARTS MISSION OAK CLIFF ↗
- Who funds TR SALVATION ARMY-STAUNTON UA H ↗
- Who funds IRVING SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP WEST FAITH FORMULA ↗
- Who funds MASTERS HARVEST ↗
- Who funds UT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds KIDS COVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds FOR OAK CLIFF ↗
- Who funds DESOTO FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SENIOR SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds University of Dallas ↗
- Who funds Cedar Hill Shares Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · North Texas Food Bank · Hillcrest Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Dallas Mavericks Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Baron & Blue Foundation · World Vision Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crossroads Community Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.