Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Cpca Ventures

To provide needy individuals and families access to health care services, or support, or promote such service providers, including california primary care association.

$1.0M
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2023.

Health$1.3MPhilanthropy$30k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION$1,000,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $30k → 9%WEST OAKLAND HEALTH: $30k → 10%OPERATION SAMAHAN: $30k → 11%CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $1.0M → 12%ST JOHNS: $30k → 14%CLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC: $30k → 21%HERALD CHRISTIAN: $30k → 14%SOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY: $30k → 14%UNIVERSAL COMMUNITY: $30k → 14%QUEENSCARE: $30k → 14%TRI-STATE COMMUNITY: $30k → 14%YEHOWA MEDICAL SERVICES: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
2
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
3
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
4
Communicare Health Centers

Communicare health center's mission is rooted in the underlying philosophy that health care is a right, not a privilege. our mission is characterized by the following commitments: (i) we provide comprehensive and high-quality health care…

—
5
Los Angeles Christian Health Centers

The mission of los angeles christian health centers is to follow christ by loving and serving our neighbors through the provision of comprehensive quality healthcare. our vision is the healing and restoration of homeless and underserved…

Health
6
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
7
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
8
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
9
Redwoods Rural Health Center Inc

Redwoods Rural Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that provides primary, preventative healthcare services to all people without regard to social or economic status.

Health
10
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
11
All Inclusive Community Health Cent

The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.

Health
12
Complete Care Community Health Center I

The organization's mission is to eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for underserved communities in california.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Samahan Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clinicas De Salud Del Pueblo Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $1,000,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION+11 more — $330,000 · Health+11 moreST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH — $30,000 · Philanthropy
Health$1,330,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WEST OAKLAND HEALTH COUNCIL — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-STATE COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetQueensCare — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYEHOWA MEDICAL SERVICES — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversal Community Health Center — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION SAMAHAN INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Healthcare…Direct ReliefKaiser Foundation Hos…California Physicians…California Primary Ca…Essential Access Heal…Tides FoundationPublic Health Institu…The California Endowm…The Rose Hills Founda…The Ahmanson Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…
California Healthcare FoundationCA23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Healthcare Foundation · Direct Relief · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · California Primary Care Association · Essential Access Health · Tides Foundation · Public Health Institute · The California Endowment · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cpca Ventures funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines