Skip to content
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc

Development of state surveillance and epidemiologist training

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
23
States reached
$583k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$36MEducation$2.7MPublic Benefit$604kCivil Rights$482kScience & Tech$477kEnvironment$407kPublic Safety & Disaster$334kRecreation & Sports$208kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 58 grants below total $5,543,020, the rows itemized in this filing. The $10,940,123 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,397,103 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k25 grants · $784k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
$59,134
Median grant
23
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSOC OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES$582,885
SALT LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$373,835
SALT LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$305,903
SALT LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$288,106
NORTH CAROLINA DEPT OF HLTH & HUMAN SVCS$236,202
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$224,964
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$207,053
NORTH CAROLINA DEPT OF HLTH & HUMAN SVCS$187,018
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$170,517
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$170,472
MICHIGAN DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE$151,265
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$125,752
PREDICTIVE SCIENCE INC$124,706
SIGNATURE SCIENCE LLC$124,389
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$124,257
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $215k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER: $263k → 12%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $792k → 11%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $224k → 10%NYC OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER: $445k → 13%IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: $375k → 10%GREAT LAKES INTER-TRIBAL EPIDEM: $191k → 10%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $186k → 14%SALT LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $804k → 8%COBB & DOUGLAS PUBLIC HEALTH: $197k → 8%GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH: $225k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $259k → 27%INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $374k → 16%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $387k → 15%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $208k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $296k → 8%GREAT PLAINS TRIBAL CHAIRMEN'S HEALTH BOARD: $228k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $185k → 19%PREDICTIVE SCIENCE INC: $173k → 11%NORTHWEST PORTLAND AREA INDIAN: $177k → 12%SALT LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $412k → 8%COBB-DOUGLAS PUBLIC HEALTH: $191k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $247k → 27%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $385k → 15%URBAN INDIAN HEALTH INSTITUTE: $550k → 9%SALT LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $374k → 8%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $225k → 15%UTAH DEPT OF HEALTH: $345k → 8%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $211k → 15%UTAH DEPT OF HEALTH: $336k → 8%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $207k → 15%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $202k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $180k → 14%SALT LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $306k → 8%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $200k → 15%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $190k → 9%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $279k → 8%UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $295k → 8%OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $180k → 15%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $178k → 8%SALT LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $288k → 8%OHIO DEPT OF HEALTH: $179k → 15%UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $266k → 8%UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $242k → 8%UTAH DEPT OF HEALTH: $212k → 8%COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS: $325k → 16%UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $196k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $185k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40M · 90 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

90 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 63 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
71

Total granted

$40M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+78%

Still filing today

14%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $765k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthScience & TechRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +18%
  • UO
    University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +28%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $942k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • UI
    URBAN INDIAN HEALTH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $550k
  • GL
    GREAT LAKES INTER-TRIBAL EPIDEM
    one grant, 2018 · $191k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2024 · $185k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
7
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
8
Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 3,700 provides research and technical (continued on…

Science & Tech
9
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
10
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
11
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science

Charles r. drew university of medicine and science is a private non-profit student-centered university that is committed to cultivating diverse health professional leaders who are dedicated to social justice and health equity for…

Education
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sequoia Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN DEP OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $3,416,151 · OtherMICHIGAN DEP OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICESSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $2,588,102 · OtherSTATE OF UTAH GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTSTATE OF OHIO: $2,440,916 · OtherSTATE OF OHIOSALT LAKE COUNTY: $2,279,644 · OtherSALT LAKE COUNTYMINNESOTA ZOO: $1,772,451 · Other+142 more: $26,734,051 · Other+142 moreLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $1,025,064 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERS…University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $1,000,493 · EducationUniversity of …THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $999,113 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES O…NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $942,103 · EducationNORTHEASTERN U…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $915,266 · EducationTHE BOARD OF T…WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $500,787 · EducationWESTERN MICHIG…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $213,907 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $209,625 · Education+3 more: $235,439 · EducationGREAT PLAINS TRIBAL LEADERS HEALTH: $274,733 · HealthCALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC: $127,600 · HealthHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $123,938 · HealthALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $100,000 · HealthSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $59,830 · HealthCOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Health+1 more: $20,000 · HealthSouthwest Research Institute: $502,203 · Science & TechGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC: $52,371 · Science & TechBROWN UNIVERSITY: $271,620 · Community ImprovementNorthwestern University: $229,005 · Recreation & SportsSequoia Foundation: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$39,231,315Education$6,041,797Health$756,101Science & Tech$554,574Community Improvement$271,620Recreation & Sports$229,005Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $1,025,064 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $1,000,493 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $999,113 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $942,103 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $915,266 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $810,874 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSouthwest Research Institute: $502,203 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $500,787 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT PLAINS TRIBAL LEADERS HEALTH: $274,733 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $271,620 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $229,005 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $213,907 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $209,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC: $127,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED SOUTH AND EASTERN TRIBESINC: $127,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $123,938 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $117,293 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCSTE FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 1y, 77% of budgetCANCER PATIENTS ALLIANCE: $80,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $65,439 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $59,830 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND SERVICE FOUNDATIONINC: $52,371 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSequoia Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Southwest Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Association of State …Association of Public…National Foundation f…Investor Protection T…Association of Matern…National Environmenta…American Bar Associat…National Fish and Wil…North American Associ…The Pew Charitable Tr…Recreational Boating …National Assembly of …
Association of State and Territorial Health OfficialsVA67.3× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Investor Protection Trust · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · National Environmental Health Association · American Bar Association · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation · National Assembly of State Arts Agencies Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 170 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home