Skip to content
Community Health Group at a glance

· Public charity

Community Health Group

COMMUNITY HEALTH GROUP is dedicated to maintaining and improving the health of our members by providing access to quality care and offering exceptional service to diverse populations.

$107k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Health$143kEducation$51kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kYouth Development$17kPhilanthropy$12kHuman Services$8kCivil Rights$5k
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $56,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $107,283 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,783 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$114M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC$15,000
CHULA VISTA POLICE FOUNDATION$12,500
SAN YSIDRO HEALTH CENTER$10,000
LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC$8,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE$6,000
VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHICANO FEDERATION: $5k → 11%211 SAN DIEGO: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 9 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +128% since the first grant, against +117% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$229k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
+117%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $72k · revenue +262%
  • MD
    MANA DE SAN DIEGO
    2× · 2018–2019 · $51k · revenue +37%
  • FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • IL
    INFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +117%
  • NS
    NAMI SAN DIEGOgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +154%
  • SH
    SCRIPPS HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Imperial Beach Community Clinic

Operate clinics to providing primary healthcare to people of all ages in imperial beach and surrounding communities and southwest San Diego county place emphasis on patient satisfaction in a sensitive environment.

—
2
Clinicas De Salud Del Pueblo Inc

Clinicas is the safety net provider for Imperial and Eastern Riverside Counties providing primary health care to low income and medically under served populations. We provide comprehensive, preventative and treatment services, pediatric,…

Health
3
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
4
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
5
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
6
Vista Community Health Center
—
7
Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center

Sharp chula vista medical center provides inpatient and outpatient medical services to the community.

Health
8
La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc

La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.

—
9
San Diego American Indian Health Center

The Mission of San Diego American Indian Health Center is to promote excellence in health care with respect to custom and tradition. Our goal is to reduce the significant health disparities San Diego's Urban American Indian and…

Health
10
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

—
11
Community Information Exchange
Health
12
El Centro Del Barrio Inc

CentroMed is a network of integrated primary care clinics providing accessible services of superior quality.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health Centers of San Diego Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ismael Cala Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $72,045 · HealthCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INCFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC: $20,050 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INCVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $15,500 · HealthVISTA COMMUNITY CLINICLA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC: $13,160 · HealthLA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INCSCRIPPS HEALTH: $5,500 · HealthMANA DE SAN DIEGO: $51,430 · EducationMANA DE SAN DIEGOCHULA VISTA POLICE FOUNDATION: $17,500 · Crime & LegalNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE: $11,000 · OtherNAMI SAN DIEGO: $6,000 · OtherISMAEL CALA FOUNDATION INC: $16,586 · Youth DevelopmentINFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $8,000 · Human ServicesCHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 · Human ServicesMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Philanthropy
Health$126,255Education$51,430Crime & Legal$17,500Other$17,000Youth Development$16,586Human Services$13,000Philanthropy$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $72,045 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMANA DE SAN DIEGO: $51,430 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC: $20,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHULA VISTA POLICE FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetISMAEL CALA FOUNDATION INC: $16,586 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC: $13,160 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI SAN DIEGO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chg FoundationThe San Diego Foundat…The Conrad Prebys Fou…The Parker FoundationPrice Philanthropies …California Healthcare…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Tides FoundationCalifornia Primary Ca…Essential Access Heal…Alliance Healthcare F…Leichtag Foundation
Chg FoundationCA26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chg Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Tides Foundation · California Primary Care Association · Essential Access Health · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · Leichtag Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Group funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Group. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home