· Public charity
Community Health Group
COMMUNITY HEALTH GROUP is dedicated to maintaining and improving the health of our members by providing access to quality care and offering exceptional service to diverse populations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $56,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $107,283 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,783 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC | $15,000 |
| CHULA VISTA POLICE FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| SAN YSIDRO HEALTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC | $8,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE | $6,000 |
| VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +128% since the first grant, against +117% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CDCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC3× · 2018–2020 · $72k · revenue +262%
- MDMANA DE SAN DIEGO2× · 2018–2019 · $51k · revenue +37%
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +128%
Funded once
- ILINFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +117%
- NSNAMI SAN DIEGOgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +154%
- SHSCRIPPS HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate clinics to providing primary healthcare to people of all ages in imperial beach and surrounding communities and southwest San Diego county place emphasis on patient satisfaction in a sensitive environment.
Clinicas is the safety net provider for Imperial and Eastern Riverside Counties providing primary health care to low income and medically under served populations. We provide comprehensive, preventative and treatment services, pediatric,…
Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Sharp chula vista medical center provides inpatient and outpatient medical services to the community.
La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.
The Mission of San Diego American Indian Health Center is to promote excellence in health care with respect to custom and tradition. Our goal is to reduce the significant health disparities San Diego's Urban American Indian and…
Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…
CentroMed is a network of integrated primary care clinics providing accessible services of superior quality.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health Centers of San Diego Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ismael Cala Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC ↗
- Who funds MANA DE SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds CHULA VISTA POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISMAEL CALA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds INFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NAMI SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chg Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Tides Foundation · California Primary Care Association · Essential Access Health · Alliance Healthcare Foundation · Leichtag Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Health Group funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.