Skip to content
Community Foundation of the Verdugos at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Community Foundation of the Verdugos

By combining the power of donors and charitable organizations, the COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS increases the reliability and impact of non-profits by establishing endowed funds that support the impact of self-reliant organization through grants.

$687k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$112k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.1MYouth Development$376kHousing & Shelter$361kHealth$315kHuman Services$294kEducation$153kCrime & Legal$60kAnimals$54kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $351,448, the rows itemized in this filing. The $687,119 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $335,671 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $215k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLENDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$111,586
FILM MUSIC FOUNDATION$103,630
DOOR OF HOPE$17,989
YMCA OF FOOTHILLS$17,500
ADVENTIST HEALTH GLENDALE FOU$15,000
FRIENDS OF FALKON ROBOTICS$14,500
HOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES$12,000
NEW GROWTH INC$10,000
FOUNDATION OF LIVING BEAUTY$8,500
LOVE ON 4 PAWS$7,900
CRESCENTA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL$7,249
Individual grant recipient$7,199
CHACE TAYLOR MALONE IMPACT F$6,360
ARMENIAN AMERICAN MUSEUM AND$6,250
PRAGER UNIVERSITY$5,785
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $21k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $16k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS: $8k → 14%LOVE ON 4 PAWS: $8k → 14%MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $10k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF BURBANK: $8k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF BURB: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 34 repeat orgs$440k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
38

Total granted

$2.4M
$381k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+25%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Film Music Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $813k · revenue +4% · 100% of their budget
  • A
    ASCENCIA
    4× · 2017–2021 · $142k · revenue +120%
  • GH
    GLENDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2024 · $124k · revenue +82% · 66% of their budget

Funded once

  • SB
    Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • PS
    PROVIDENCE SAINT JOSEPH FOUND
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • SJ
    SCGA JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
2
Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital

It is the mission of Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital to provide superior health care for and improve the health care of our communities through a commitment to our core values of excellence, integrity, and compassion.

Health
3
Venice Family Clinic

To provide quality primary health care to people in need.

Health
4
Glendale Adventist Medical Center dba Adventist Health Glendale

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
5
Barlow Respiratory Hospital

A not-for-profit, long-term acute care specialty healthcare organization is to improve the quality of life for patients with respiratory and other diseases that may require prolonged acute hospitalization of specialized treatment.

Health
6
Burbank Housingsr Corporation

To own and operate affordable rental housing.

—
7
Bienvenidos Childrens Center Inc

Bienvenidos serves approximately 475 children and youth, impacting 1,900 family members. the foster care and adoptions program operates out of two locations in the san gabriel valley.

Human Services
8
Westcare California Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
9
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
10
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
11
Community Family Guidance Center

The center has a contract with a county agency for the purpose of providing mental health services to seriously emotionally disturbed children and adults in los angeles county and its surrounding communities.

Health
12
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Glendale and Pasadena; the most unlike its peers is New Growth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/48
Grantees still filing
34/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BURBANK AND THE GREATER EAST VALLEY: $186,311 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BURBANK AND THE GREATER …DOOR OF HOPE: $118,729 · OtherDOOR OF HOPEKIDS COMMUNITY DETNAL CLINIC: $68,000 · OtherKIDS COMMUNITY DETNAL CLINICYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA: $63,864 · OtherGLENDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $56,362 · OtherADVENTIST HEALTH GLENDALE FOU: $48,500 · OtherBOYS SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $46,249 · OtherTHE CAMPBELL CENTER: $44,778 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $60,000 · Other+40 more: $521,267 · Other+40 moreThe Film Music Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation: $813,126 · Arts & CultureThe Film Music Foundation a Cali…+1 more: $15,900 · Arts & CultureSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $65,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $40,302 · HealthKIDS COMMUNITY CLINIC OF BURBANK: $26,279 · HealthSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital: $25,000 · HealthAHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $12,500 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR LIVING BEAUTY DBA LIVING BEAUTY CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,500 · HealthOLIVE CREST: $8,000 · HealthWest Valley Counseling Center A Non-Profit Organization: $7,500 · Health+2 more: $10,000 · HealthASCENCIA: $141,750 · Housing & ShelterHOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterBurbank Housing Corporation: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterGLENDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $124,386 · Youth DevelopmentGLENDALE YOUTH ALLIANCE INC: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS and GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA BARBARAINC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAROUSEL RANCH INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BURBANK AND GREATER EAST VALLEY INC: $45,000 · EducationGlendale College Foundation: $40,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF FALKON ROBOTICS INC: $14,500 · EducationCrescenta Valley Instrumental Music Foundation: $14,077 · EducationTOBINWORLD: $12,700 · EducationProm Plus: $10,500 · EducationFOOD ON FOOT: $36,724 · Human ServicesHOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF BURBANK: $16,000 · Human ServicesLove On 4 Paws Inc: $15,400 · Human ServicesMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,214,060Arts & Culture$829,026Health$213,081Housing & Shelter$212,750Youth Development$171,886Education$136,777Human Services$108,124

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Film Music Foundation a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation: $813,126 over 8y, 100% of budgetASCENCIA: $141,750 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetGLENDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $124,386 over 2y, 66% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $118,729 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA OF GLENDALE AND PASADENA: $63,864 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLENDALE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $56,362 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetHOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES: $50,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BURBANK AND GREATER EAST VALLEY INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CAMPBELL CENTER: $44,778 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $40,302 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGlendale College Foundation: $40,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFOOD ON FOOT: $36,724 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetYMCA OF THE FOOTHILLS: $33,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCATCAFE LOUNGE: $28,673 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetGLENDALE YOUTH ALLIANCE INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS COMMUNITY CLINIC OF BURBANK: $26,279 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $19,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF BURBANK: $16,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGLENDALE ARTS: $15,900 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLove On 4 Paws Inc: $15,400 over 2y, 10% of budgetBurbank Housing Corporation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF FALKON ROBOTICS INC: $14,500 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetCrescenta Valley Instrumental Music Foundation: $14,077 over 1y, 12% of budgetTOBINWORLD: $12,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $12,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetGLENDALE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGLENDALE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 1y, 25% of budgetMILOS SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCALM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Growth Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetBOYS and GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA BARBARAINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAROUSEL RANCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR LIVING BEAUTY DBA LIVING BEAUTY CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetExtraordinary Families: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPenny Lane Centers: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWest Valley Counseling Center A Non-Profit Organization: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS: $6,171 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Glendale Police Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUSC VERDUGO HILLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson Foundati…The Rose Hills Founda…The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationThe Green FoundationCalifornia Community …Dignity Community CareKaiser Foundation Hos…Dignity HealthProvidence Health & S…S Mark Taper Foundati…Shelter Partnership I…
The Ahmanson FoundationCA32.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Green Foundation · California Community Foundation · Dignity Community Care · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Dignity Health · Providence Health & Services Foundation San Fernando & Santa Clarita Valleys Sa · S Mark Taper Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Foundation of the Verdugos funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Foundation of the Verdugos. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Community Foundation of the Verdugos?

Find your warmest path to Community Foundation of the Verdugos through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Foundation of the Verdugos’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home