· Public charity
College Board
Our mission is to serve over 6,000 members and connect more than 7 million students to college success and career opportunity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 71 grants below total $1,964,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,210,121 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,245,871 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $117k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $764k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $833k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Board of Control for Southern Regional Education | $250,000 |
| Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc | $125,000 |
| Braven Incorporated | $102,562 |
| The Trinity Forum Inc | $100,000 |
| EDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC | $100,000 |
| National College Attainment Network | $75,000 |
| California County Superintendents | $62,050 |
| American Association of School Administrators | $59,429 |
| THE YGS GROUP | $59,200 |
| SXSW LLC | $50,000 |
| JAMES B HUNT JR INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND POLICY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| American School Counselor Association | $50,000 |
| Jobs for the Future | $40,000 |
| MILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION | $30,000 |
| Texas Association of School Administrators | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
68 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $845k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC3× · 2021–2024 · $205k · revenue +69%
- HSHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND5× · 2017–2024 · $197k · revenue +14%
- NCNATIONAL COLLEGE ATTAINMENT NETWORK5× · 2019–2024 · $172k · revenue +133%
Funded once
- DSDO SOMETHING INCone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -63%
- TCTHE CHARACTER LAB INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $175k · revenue +521%
- NCNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $148k · revenue +182%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.
Advancing a national community to foster equity in dual and concurrent enrollment through accreditation, advocacy, research, and professional development.
Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…
Our mission is to advocate for education professionals and to unite our members and the nation to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…
Aacte elevates education and educator preparation through research, professional practice, advocacy, and collaboration.
The career education colleges and universities (cecu) is the premier source of crucial information and public policy recommendations that promote access to career education and the importance of workforce development.
Acpa transforms higher education by creating and sharing influential scholarship, shaping critically reflective practice, and advocating for equitable and inclusive learning environments.
The council is dedicated to serving students and their families, colleges and universities, sponsoring bodies, governments and employers by promoting academic quality through formal recognition of higher education accrediting bodies and…
University professional and continuing education association (upcea) advances leadership in professional, continuing and online education. the association is dedicated to meeting the needs of professional members and the institutions they…
To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Alliance for Public Charter Schools and the most unlike its peers is Popular Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
152 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 152 of the 191 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MASS INSIGHT EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOARD OF CONTROL FOR SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS ↗
- Who funds THE MUSEUM OF LANGUAGE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds DO SOMETHING INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENTS ↗
- Who funds THE CHARACTER LAB INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE ATTAINMENT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SCHOOL COUNSELOR ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL RURAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds BRAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINSTRATORS ↗
- Who funds SMARTHISTORY INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF THE GREAT CITY SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR COLLEGE ADMISSION COUNSELING ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL EXECUTIVES ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES B HUNT JR INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP & POLICY FDN ↗
- Who funds American Association of School Administrators Inc ↗
- Who funds TRINITY FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY THROUGH HALLOWED GROUND PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF DISTRICT SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENTS INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds POPULAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds STATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · Strada Education Foundation Inc · Ecmc Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Wallace Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · The Joyce Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization College Board funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Verse Video Education — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
- Mass Insight Education and Research Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Coalition of Oregon School Administrators — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.