Skip to content
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights

To advance the human & civil rights of immigrants & refugees in los angeles; promote harmonious multi-ethnic human relations.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$1.3MHuman Services$877kCivil Rights$669kInternational$620kEducation$346kEmployment$316kReligion$160kCommunity Improvement$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $414,710, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,415,770 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,001,060 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $363k
$74,357
Median grant
1
States reached
$67M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alliance for a Better Community$151,500
Clergy Laity United for Economic Justice$76,853
Building Skills Partnership$74,357
CARECEN$60,000
Catholic Charities of Los Angeles Inc$45,000
RAIZES COLLECTIVE$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $716k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Celebration Nation Inc: $6k → 8%El Concilio Family Services: $125k → 10%CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY ACTION: $25k → 20%NPNA: $20k → 14%El Concilio Family Services: $119k → 10%CENTRO C H A INC: $53k → 14%NPNA: $15k → 14%El Concilio Family Services: $100k → 10%NPNA: $12k → 14%Catholic Charities of Los Angeles Inc: $45k → 14%CARECEN: $103k → 14%CARECEN: $60k → 14%KOREAN RESOURCE CENTER: $33k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 14 repeat orgs$583k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$3.8M
$386k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEmploymentArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT
    3× · 2021–2023 · $662k · revenue +48%
  • CJ
    COMMUNITY JUSTICE ALLIANCE INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $652k · revenue +380% · 34% of their budget
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $620k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • TL
    Tzunu LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $160k
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $102k · revenue +27%
  • Korean Resource Center Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue -69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights

To advance the human & civil rights of immigrants & refugees in los angeles; promote harmonious multi-ethnic human relations.

Civil Rights
2
California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice

Ccij utilizes coordination, advocacy, and legal services to fight for the liberationof immigrants in detention in california. we seek to empower immigrants in detentionand their communities through technical assistance, education, and…

—
3
Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
4
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
5
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
6
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
7
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
8
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
9
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
10
California Center for Movement Legal Services

The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…

Crime & Legal
11
Latin American Coalition

The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…

Human Services
12
Immigrant Legal Resource Center

To work with and educate immigrants, community organizations, and the legal sector to continue to build a democratic society that values diversity and the rights of all people.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central American Resource Center - Carecen - of California; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT: $662,324 · Human ServicesMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZI…EL CONCILIO FAMILY SERVICES: $345,093 · Human ServicesEL CONCILIO FAMILY SERVICESCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California: $162,500 · Human ServicesCentral American Resource Center - …CENTRO CHA INC: $77,875 · Human ServicesCENTRO CHA INCNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS: $47,000 · Human Services+3 more: $84,000 · Human Services+3 moreCOMMUNITY JUSTICE ALLIANCE INC: $651,991 · Civil RightsCOMMUNITY JUSTICE ALL…Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice: $162,000 · Civil RightsClergy and Laity Unit…+2 more: $19,500 · Civil RightsInternational Rescue Committee INC: $619,939 · InternationalInternational R…Building Skills Partnership: $213,918 · EmploymentBuilding …Community Action Board: $142,515 · EmploymentCommunity…Education and Leadership Foundation: $346,238 · EducationSanta Barbara County Immigrant Legal Defense Center: $343,794 · Crime & LegalTzunu LLC: $160,000 · OtherTzunu LLCALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY: $151,500 · OtherALLIANCE FOR …LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $101,901 · OtherLOS ANGELES A…Raizes Collective: $24,000 · OtherCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA: $17,500 · OtherCALIFORNIA CHANGELAWYERS: $20,000 · Other+5 more: $41,200 · Other+5 more
Human Services$1,378,792Civil Rights$833,491International$619,939Employment$356,433Education$346,238Crime & Legal$343,794Other$516,101

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT: $662,324 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY JUSTICE ALLIANCE INC: $651,991 over 3y, 34% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $619,939 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEducation and Leadership Foundation: $346,238 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetEL CONCILIO FAMILY SERVICES: $345,093 over 3y, 14% of budgetSanta Barbara County Immigrant Legal Defense Center: $343,794 over 3y, 32% of budgetBuilding Skills Partnership: $213,918 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California: $162,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetClergy and Laity United for Economic Justice: $162,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY: $151,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCommunity Action Board: $142,515 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $101,901 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCENTRO CHA INC: $77,875 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS: $47,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKorean Resource Center Inc: $33,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRaizes Collective: $24,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA CHANGELAWYERS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA: $17,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPASSION CREATES CHANGE: $10,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCELEBRATION NATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…Immigrant Legal Resou…California Community …Weingart FoundationThe California Wellne…Catholic Legal Immigr…The James Irvine Foun…Tides FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncNaleo Educational FundLatino Community Foun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
The California EndowmentCA30× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc · The James Irvine Foundation · Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Naleo Educational Fund · Latino Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights?

    Find your warmest path to Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home