· Public charity
Chicago White Sox Charities Inc
Chicago white sox charities ("cwsc") provides financial and emotional support to chicago-based organizations, including those leading the fight against cancer, dedicated to improving the lives of youth through recreation and education, and those offering support to children and families in crisis.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $252k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
- $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WHITE SOX COMMUNITY FUND | $532,000 |
| RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER | $500,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO | $500,000 |
| NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| WHITE SOX COMMUNITY FUND-CHICAGO SPORTS ALLIANCE | $200,000 |
| LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
| ROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
| PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES | $25,000 |
| ROAD HOME PROGRAM RUSH | $21,500 |
| CASA OF COOK COUNTY | $20,000 |
| WORKING IN THE SCHOOLS (WITS) | $20,000 |
| JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CHARITIES CNI | $20,000 |
| ST JAMES CATHOLIC CHURCH | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 19% of Chicago White Sox Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $649k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Chicago3× · 2017–2024 · $749k · revenue +56%- RURush University Medical Center4× · 2018–2024 · $562k · revenue +39%
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago4× · 2021–2024 · $228k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- DDDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -44% · 29% of their budget
- SUSTAND UP TO CANCERone grant, 2023 · $1.0M
- CECITIZEN EDUCATION FUND INCone grant, 2023 · $205k · revenue -39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.
We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…
The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.
To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy
The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
Champion humanitarian & patient-centered roles for pathologists. connect those in need to the specialized, life savings skills of pathologists. confer training & awards to residents.
To optimize philanthropy in support of the mission and future of the children's hospital of chicago medical center.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Metropolitan Chicago Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds PUSH FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO BASEBALL CANCER CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
- Who funds CITIZEN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds Special Children's Charities ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
- Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding Children Everywhere Inc ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COOK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago Medical Center ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chicago Blackhawks Foundation ↗
- Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BASEBALL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds NEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Robert R McCormick Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Circle of Service Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Coleman Foundation Inc · Chicago Bulls Charities · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Major League Baseball Charities Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Ayco Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chicago White Sox Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Chicago White Sox Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Chicago White Sox Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.