Skip to content

· Public charity

Charlotte Steeplechase Foundation Inc

To organize a steeplechase race and distribute funds to charity.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$248k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$982kEnvironment$285kInternational$108kHuman Services$91kEducation$75kArts & Culture$50kFood & Nutrition$50kHousing & Shelter$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catawba Lands Conservancy$247,500
The Alzheimer's Assoc$230,000
Atrium Health Foundation$130,000
Make A Wish Foundation$130,000
Samaritan's Purse$82,500
The St Paul's Schools$75,000
Susan G Komen Foundation$66,250
National Multiple Sclerosis Society Greater Carolinas Chapter$66,250
Thompson Child and Family Focus$66,250
Joe Martin ALS Foundation$66,250
Hopeway Foundation$50,000
Atrium Health Foundation$50,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$50,000
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic$50,000
Purple Heart Homes Inc$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Misty Meadows Mitey Riders Inc: $25k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
The Presbyterian Hospital

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
3
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Presbyterian Hospital Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
7
Wellstar Sylvan Grove Hospital

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Health
8
Forsyth Medical Center Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
9
Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
10
Wellstar Mcg Health Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice.

—
11
Novant Medical Group Inc

Our cause we create a healthier future and bring remarkable experiences to life. discover we consistently seek to innovate, courageously transform ourselves and find new ways to add value for our patients, communities and one another.…

—
12
Nhrmc Home Care

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
8/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $230,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIA…ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $180,000 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATIONNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $66,250 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $66,250 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation IncThe Joe Martin ALS Foundation: $66,250 · HealthThe Joe Martin ALS FoundationHopeWay Foundation: $50,000 · HealthHopeWay FoundationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $50,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCNOVANT HEALTH INC: $25,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $130,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERIC…ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $117,801 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONTHE ST PAULS SCHOOLS INC: $75,000 · OtherTHE ST PAULS SCHOOLS INCTHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC: $66,250 · OtherTHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS IN…SEARCH MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 · OtherMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $25,000 · OtherSilent Images Inc: $25,000 · OtherTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $25,000 · Other+2 more: $15,276 · OtherCatawba Lands Conservancy: $285,301 · EnvironmentCatawba Lands Conser…BROOKGREEN GARDENS: $25,000 · EnvironmentBROOKGREEN GARDENSSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $82,500 · ReligionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionPURPLE HEART HOMES INC: $35,000 · Public BenefitCAMP PASQUANEY: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsTEMPLE GWATHMEY STEEPLECHASE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$733,750Other$504,327Environment$310,301Religion$82,500Food & Nutrition$50,000Public Benefit$35,000Recreation & Sports$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatawba Lands Conservancy: $285,301 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $230,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $130,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC: $66,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $66,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $66,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSilent Images Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetCAMP PASQUANEY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUCSO FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetGirl Scouts Hornets Nest Council: $5,276 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC24.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Charlotte Jewish Community · Dowd Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charlotte Steeplechase Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charlotte Steeplechase Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charlotte Steeplechase Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Charlotte Steeplechase Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charlotte Steeplechase’s filings →

    More from the funding graph