· Public charity
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science
Charles r.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $15,004,343 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $24,146,182 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,141,839 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $98k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $271k
- $250k+3 grants · $15M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CDU FOUNDATION | $13,533,310 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES | $681,842 |
| KEDREN COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES | $420,833 |
| HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC | $125,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE CAMPUS | $82,395 |
| LACADA (LOS ANGELES CENTERS FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE) | $63,444 |
| CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $31,338 |
| ST JOHN'S | $24,777 |
| LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION | $19,404 |
| TRI-CITY MEDICAL GROUP DBA OF JACK AZAD MD INC | $12,000 |
| GRANADA ON BROADWAY OUTREACH PROJECT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +145% since the first grant, against +60% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $324k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCDU FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2025 · $23M · revenue ×86 · 99% of their budget
- KCKEDREN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERINC6× · 2020–2025 · $4.2M · revenue +176%
ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +145%
Funded once
- TCTESSIE CLEVELAND COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $123k · revenue +60%
- SCSouthside Coalition of Community Health Centersone grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
Loma Linda University Health Care is organized to support the clinical teaching programs of Loma Linda University School of Medicine in conjunction with Loma Linda University and Loma Linda University Medical Center by providing medical…
The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…
La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.
To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.
The mission of los angeles christian health centers is to follow christ by loving and serving our neighbors through the provision of comprehensive quality healthcare. our vision is the healing and restoration of homeless and underserved…
Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.
Our mission is to continue the healing ministry of jesus christ, "to make man whole," in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles General Medical Center Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Granada On Broadway Outreach Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CDU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KEDREN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERINC ↗
- Who funds Drew Cares International ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds TESSIE CLEVELAND COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR-LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCILS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Southside Coalition of Community Health Centers ↗
- Who funds GRANADA ON BROADWAY OUTREACH PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Unihealth Foundation · Baby2baby · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Public Health Institute · Community Partners · Tides Center · Community Health Councils Inc · University of Southern California
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.