· Private foundation
Charles & Lucille King Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $295k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST | $350,000 |
| FILM FORUM | $200,000 |
| WNET | $100,000 |
| UNION COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| BREAKTHOUGH COLLABORATIVE | $100,000 |
| NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO | $100,000 |
| LIFECAMP INC | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN SCANDINAVIAN FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| SPELMAN COLLEGE | $85,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEY | $80,000 |
| GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT | $70,000 |
| UNION COLLEGE | $60,000 |
| THE PLAYERS FOUNDATION FOR THEATRE EDUCATION | $40,000 |
| BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS | $40,000 |
| BOFFO | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
109 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 84 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSpelman College6× · 2017–2024 · $8.9M · revenue +46%
- PHPRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +285% · 96% of their budget
The Ohio University Foundation3× · 2020–2022 · $1.9M · revenue +204%
Funded once
- MNMETROPOLITAN NEW YORK SYNODone grant, 2020 · $2.0M
- TCTHE CLASSICAL THEATRE OF HARLEM INCone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +5% · 31% of their budget
- HSHARLEM STAGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $750k · revenue +32% · 27% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Access Inc and the most unlike its peers is Scandinavian Seminar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 174 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds PRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FILM FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗
- Who funds ROWAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds BROADCAST EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLASSICAL THEATRE OF HARLEM INC ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds HARLEM STAGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds The American-Scandinavian Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds EMERSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds Columbia College Chicago ↗
- Who funds Visual Arts Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LIFE CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ACADEMY OF ART ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' STUDIO INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NUTRITION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Louis G Piancone Charitable Foundation Inc · The Kean Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Fournier Family Foundation · Reed Family Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles & Lucille King Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Raritan Headwaters Association — 94% of income from government
- Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc — 40% of income from government
- Food Bank of South Jersey Inc — 30% of income from government
- Nourishnj Inc — 27% of income from government
- Life Camp Inc — 4% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Mane Stream Inc — 1% of income from government
- Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
- Rowan University Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Champlain College Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charles & Lucille King Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Charles & Lucille King Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.