· Private foundation
The Fournier Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $3k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $404k
- $250k+1 grant · $4.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST BENEDICT'S PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $4,422,377 |
| LIBERTY CORNER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $100,000 |
| DONORS TRUST | $100,000 |
| ASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES | $100,000 |
| ANIMAL ALLIANCE | $53,995 |
| READ ALLIANCE | $50,000 |
| FOCUS FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS IN UNIVERSITIES AND SCHOOLS | $40,000 |
| MYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE | $30,000 |
| PROJECT 292 | $1,000 |
| HARBOR HOMES OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD | $1,000 |
| PBA LOCAL 347 | $500 |
| PBA LOCAL 139 | $300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $684k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +28%
- UIUSONA INSTITUTE INC2× · 2019–2020 · $1.0M · revenue +26%
Vanderbilt University4× · 2017–2020 · $850k · revenue +74%
Funded once
- HBHEALING BREAKTHROUGHone grant, 2023 · $2.1M · 39% of their budget
- MMAPSone grant, 2020 · $500k
- ECEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Morristown beard school is an educational college preparatory school in grades 6 to 12 located in morristown, new jersey.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstone Family Programs and the most unlike its peers is Riverstyx Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 47% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEALING BREAKTHROUGH ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds USONA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds BETTER EDUCATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds THE PECK SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
- Who funds LIFE CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC ↗
- Who funds KENT PLACE SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The McJ Amelior Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Healey Family Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Risor Foundation · Ej Grassmann Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Fournier Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community in Crisis Inc — 56% of income from government
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
- Aha Foundation Inc — 42% of income from government
- Nourishnj Inc — 27% of income from government
- Life Camp Inc — 4% of income from government
- Cornerstone Family Programs — 3% of income from government
- Family Promise Inc — 2% of income from government
- Harbor Homes of Martha's Vineyard Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mane Stream Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Fournier Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Fournier Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.