Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$514k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$623kHousing & Shelter$441kInternational$395kRecreation & Sports$265kCommunity Improvement$225kHealth$120kEducation$85kHuman Services$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fellowship Bible Church$250,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Mission of Hope Hatai$60,000
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$40,000
Dream Center of Jackson$21,000
Scarlet Rope Project$10,000
Union University$10,000
Birth Choice$10,000
Samaritan's Purse$5,000
One Vision International$5,000
First Baptist Church$3,000
Pass through from Energy Transfer LP 30-0108820$5
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 11%MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 11%MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 14 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$2.8M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+73%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    The Dream Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $441k · revenue +61% · 26% of their budget
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +120%
  • MO
    MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $105k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • PC
    PEOPLES CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • KM
    KEEP MY HOOD GOOD
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture
4
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
5
Trinity Hope Inc

Teach christian beliefs and feed children in haiti.

International
6
Overseas Campus Ministries Inc

To preach and propogate the gospel of jesus christ in the united states and throughout the world, to provide christian literature and training materials through various forms of media, and to offer christian leadership and discipleship…

Religion
7
Trinity College of the Bible and Theological Seminary

Trinity equips men and women with a christian world view of leadership and service in life, work and minsitry through distance education that encourages professional and academic excellence.

Education
8
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
9
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
10
International Partnerships Inc

To provide support for the efforts of christians of the former soviet union in reaching the influencers of their countries for christ.

Religion
11
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
12
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission of Hope Inc Mission of Hope Haiti Inc; the most unlike its peers is Birth Choice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $900,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH: $441,500 · OtherFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCHMission of Hope Hatai: $150,000 · OtherMission of Hope Hatai+6 more: $73,505 · OtherThe Dream Center: $441,000 · Human ServicesThe Dream CenterMISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF HOPE INTERN…SCARLET ROPE PROJECT: $20,000 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $265,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP…MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $240,000 · ReligionMISSION OF…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'…+2 more: $8,000 · ReligionBIRTH CHOICE INC: $70,000 · HealthWEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $45,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON: $30,000 · EducationUNION UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education
Other$1,565,005Human Services$566,000Youth Development$265,000Religion$263,000Health$120,000Education$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Dream Center: $441,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $265,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $240,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $105,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetBIRTH CHOICE INC: $70,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSCARLET ROPE PROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKONTAKTMISSION USA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Dream Center ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTH CHOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON ↗
  • Who funds SCARLET ROPE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds UNION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ONE VISION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds KONTAKTMISSION USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Tn Healthcare Foundation IncTN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Tn Healthcare Foundation Inc · Covenant Legacy Foundation · James E Campbell Family Foundation 26-3889180 · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Murray Foundation Inc · Charles P Wilson Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles & Debby Campbell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph