Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Murray Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$31kHuman Services$27kArts & Culture$7kReligion$4kYouth Development$3kHousing & Shelter$2kPhilanthropy$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON ARTS COUNCIL$2,000
CARE CENTER$2,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TN$2,000
EXCHANGE CENTER CARL PERKINS$2,000
HOPE RECOVERY CENTER$1,200
LIBERTY GARDEN PARK CONSERVANCY$1,000
RIFA$1,000
MADISON COUNTY YOUTH BASEBALL$800
FCA$500
YOUNG LIFE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%DREAM CENTER OF JACKSON: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$61k · 11 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -45% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$61k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-45%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CARE CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $8k · revenue +22%
  • JA
    JACKSON ARTS COUNCIL
    5× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +20%
  • SC
    Star Center Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Dream Center
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trc the Recovery Center

Our continuing mission is to change the lives of those who suffer from alcohol and drug addiction.

Health
2
Wyandotte Pregnancy Clinic Inc

Pregnancy counseling

Health
3
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
4
Life Choices Resource Center Inc

To provide pregnancy testing (including ultrasound examinations), counseling, and referrals as needed (including post-abortion counseling) in our offices and through our 24-hour help-line.

5
Care Net Center of Greater Orleans

Pregnancy counseling

Unclassified
6
Carolina Pregnancy Center

We are a crisis pregnancy center offering assistance to all women with pregnancy related issues.

Health
7
Womens Care Center of Milwaukee Corp

WCC of Milwaukee Corp provides pregnancy resources such as education, counseling, free pregnancy tests and ultrasounds, tangible assistance, assistance, and parenting supplies to financially disadvantage women.

Human Services
8
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
9
Women's Care Center Inc

Offer life-affirming choices for pregnancy and sexual health.

Health
10
Women's Care Center of Irc Inc

Counseling and pregnancy care services including pregnancy testing and ultrasound examinations.

Human Services
11
Onslow Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

Pregnancy and abortion related issues

Human Services
12
Pregnancy Care Center

The Pregnancy Care Center is a Christian organization to promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to boldly endorse the sacredness of all human life, by providing comprehensive, practical services as enduring alternatives to abortion.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Care Center and the most unlike its peers is Birth Choice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EXCHANGE CENTER CARL PERKINS — $10,250 · OtherEXCHANGE CENTER CARL PERKINSREGIONAL INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION INC — $9,500 · OtherREGIONAL INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION INCWOMEN OF HOPE CENTER — $7,000 · OtherWOMEN OF HOPE CENTERFCA — $4,250 · OtherFCAWEST TN AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $2,000 · OtherWEST TN AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICACOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TN — $2,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WEST TN+2 more — $1,800 · OtherWEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · HealthWEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCTHE CARE CENTER — $8,000 · HealthTHE CARE CENTERBIRTH CHOICE INC — $4,000 · HealthBIRTH CHOICE INCHope Recovery Center — $2,200 · HealthHope Recovery CenterJACKSON ARTS COUNCIL — $7,000 · Arts & CultureJACKSON A…Star Center Inc — $5,000 · EmploymentSCARLET ROPE PROJECT — $2,200 · Human ServicesThe Dream Center — $2,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE — $500 · Youth Development
Other$36,800Health$34,200Arts & Culture$7,000Employment$5,000Human Services$4,200Youth Development$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARE CENTER — $8,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetJACKSON ARTS COUNCIL — $7,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetStar Center Inc — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTH CHOICE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSCARLET ROPE PROJECT — $2,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHope Recovery Center — $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TN AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Dream Center — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE CARE CENTER
  • Who funds JACKSON ARTS COUNCIL
  • Who funds Star Center Inc
  • Who funds BIRTH CHOICE INC
  • Who funds SCARLET ROPE PROJECT
  • Who funds Hope Recovery Center
  • Who funds WEST TN AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds The Dream Center
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Tn Healthcare Foundation IncTN20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Tn Healthcare Foundation Inc · The Richardson Charitable Foundation · James E Campbell Family Foundation 26-3889180 · Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation · Charles P Wilson Foundation Inc · United Way of West Tennesseinc Starks · Southwest Members Care Incorporated · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Murray Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Murray Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Murray Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph