Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$514k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fellowship Bible Church$250,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Mission of Hope Hatai$60,000
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$40,000
Dream Center of Jackson$21,000
Scarlet Rope Project$10,000
Birth Choice$10,000
Union University$10,000
One Vision International$5,000
Samaritan's Purse$5,000
First Baptist Church$3,000
Pass through from Energy Transfer LP 30-0108820$5
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 11%MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 11%MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 14 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$2.8M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+73%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    The Dream Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $441k · revenue +61% · 26% of their budget
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +120%
  • MO
    MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $105k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • PC
    PEOPLES CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • KM
    KEEP MY HOOD GOOD
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture
4
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
5
Trinity Hope Inc

Teach christian beliefs and feed children in haiti.

International
6
Overseas Campus Ministries Inc

To preach and propogate the gospel of jesus christ in the united states and throughout the world, to provide christian literature and training materials through various forms of media, and to offer christian leadership and discipleship…

Religion
7
Trinity College of the Bible and Theological Seminary

Trinity equips men and women with a christian world view of leadership and service in life, work and minsitry through distance education that encourages professional and academic excellence.

Education
8
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
9
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
10
International Partnerships Inc

To provide support for the efforts of christians of the former soviet union in reaching the influencers of their countries for christ.

Religion
11
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
12
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission of Hope Inc Mission of Hope Haiti Inc and the most unlike its peers is Birth Choice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $900,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH — $441,500 · OtherFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCHMission of Hope Hatai — $150,000 · OtherMission of Hope Hatai+6 more — $73,505 · OtherThe Dream Center — $441,000 · Human ServicesThe Dream CenterMISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF HOPE INTERN…SCARLET ROPE PROJECT — $20,000 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $265,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP…MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC — $240,000 · ReligionMISSION OF…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'…+2 more — $8,000 · ReligionBIRTH CHOICE INC — $70,000 · HealthWEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $45,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON — $30,000 · EducationUNION UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Education
Other$1,565,005Human Services$566,000Youth Development$265,000Religion$263,000Health$120,000Education$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Dream Center — $441,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $265,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC — $240,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC — $105,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetBIRTH CHOICE INC — $70,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSCARLET ROPE PROJECT — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKONTAKTMISSION USA — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Dream Center
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC
  • Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds BIRTH CHOICE INC
  • Who funds WEST TN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF JACKSON
  • Who funds SCARLET ROPE PROJECT
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds UNION UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ONE VISION INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds KONTAKTMISSION USA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Tn Healthcare Foundation IncTN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Tn Healthcare Foundation Inc · Covenant Legacy Foundation · James E Campbell Family Foundation 26-3889180 · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Murray Foundation Inc · Charles P Wilson Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles & Debby Campbell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph