Skip to content
Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital

The hospital's mission is to elevate the health status of the communities served.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$395kHealth$245kFood & Nutrition$181kHuman Services$170kRecreation & Sports$30kYouth Development$20k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$183M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHCARE IN ACTION MEDICAL GROUP$75,000
MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER$30,000
ST JOSEPH CENTER$25,000
SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC$25,000
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES$20,000
INCLUSION MATTERS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES - CULVER-PALMS FAMILY YMCA BRANCH: $100k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $75k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $75k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 94%.

Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospitallessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$701k · 6 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$701k
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
+169%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CENTER
    7× · 2017–2025 · $241k · revenue +276%
  • MV
    MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER
    4× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +15%
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles
    2× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • AM
    AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue -9%
  • WI
    WESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -67%
  • AC
    Alcott Center for Mental Health Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +260%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
2
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
3
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

—
4
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
5
The Center in Hollywood

The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…

Human Services
6
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
7
Jwch Institute Inc

The specific purposes of this organization are:(a) to provide outpatient primary health service in underserved areas and/or for medically underserved populations as a community clinic. (b) to develop, promote, and manage health care…

Health
8
Instituto Familiar De La Raza

Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…

—
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Vip Community Mental Health Center Inc

Intervening to protect and treat all victims of violence

Health
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
Salud Para La Gente

To provide high quality, comprehensive, and cost effective healthcare responsive to the needs of the communities we serve.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Place for Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Inclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH CENTER: $241,250 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTERYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $120,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropol…SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INCSANTA MONICA BAY AREA HUMAN RELATIONS COUNCIL: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC: $75,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE IN ACTION INCAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE: $75,000 · HealthAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SER…VENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $60,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $60,000 · HealthWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWOR…MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER: $180,000 · OtherMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTERAlcott Center for Mental Health Services: $50,000 · OtherAlcott Center for Mental …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA INC: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$416,250Health$270,000Other$230,000Youth Development$70,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $241,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER: $180,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE: $75,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $60,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAlcott Center for Mental Health Services: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA MONICA BAY AREA HUMAN RELATIONS COUNCIL: $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Cedars-Sinai Medical …Kaiser Foundation Hos…The Rose Hills Founda…The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
California Community FoundationCA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home