Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital

The hospital's mission is to elevate the health status of the communities served.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$416kHealth$270kYouth Development$70kRecreation & Sports$30kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$230k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$183M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHCARE IN ACTION MEDICAL GROUP$75,000
MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER$30,000
SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC$25,000
ST JOSEPH CENTER$25,000
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES$20,000
INCLUSION MATTERS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES - CULVER-PALMS FAMILY YMCA BRANCH: $100k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $75k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $75k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 94% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospitallessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$701k · 6 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$701k
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
+169%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CENTER
    7× · 2017–2025 · $241k · revenue +276%
  • MV
    MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER
    4× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +15%
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles
    2× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • AM
    AIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue -9%
  • WI
    WESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -67%
  • AC
    Alcott Center for Mental Health Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +260%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
2
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
3
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

4
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
5
The Center in Hollywood

The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…

Human Services
6
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
7
Jwch Institute Inc

The specific purposes of this organization are:(a) to provide outpatient primary health service in underserved areas and/or for medically underserved populations as a community clinic. (b) to develop, promote, and manage health care…

Health
8
Instituto Familiar De La Raza

Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…

9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
Vip Community Mental Health Center Inc

Intervening to protect and treat all victims of violence

Health
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
Salud Para La Gente

To provide high quality, comprehensive, and cost effective healthcare responsive to the needs of the communities we serve.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Place for Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Inclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH CENTER — $241,250 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTERYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $120,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropol…SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INCSANTA MONICA BAY AREA HUMAN RELATIONS COUNCIL — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE — $75,000 · HealthAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SER…HEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC — $75,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE IN ACTION INCWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK — $60,000 · HealthWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWOR…VENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $60,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINICMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER — $180,000 · OtherMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTERAlcott Center for Mental Health Services — $50,000 · OtherAlcott Center for Mental …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA INC — $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$416,250Health$270,000Other$230,000Youth Development$70,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JOSEPH CENTER — $241,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER — $180,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAIRPORT MARINA COUNSELING SERVICE — $75,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK — $60,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAlcott Center for Mental Health Services — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration — $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA MONICA BAY AREA HUMAN RELATIONS COUNCIL — $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cedars-Sinai Marina Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph