Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cedar Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$745k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.0MInternational$1.0MScience & Tech$895kHealth$805kAnimals$667kPublic Benefit$605kFood & Nutrition$375kArts & Culture$330kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $265k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $470k
$30,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION$100,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$75,000
THE PERCH MUSIC & ARTS WORKSHOP$70,000
COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY$65,000
COX SCIENCE CENTER & AQUARIUM$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
THE HALO FOUNDATION$50,000
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$45,000
THE RIVER SCHOOL$35,000
THE CATHEDRAL SCHOOL OF ST JOHN THE DIVINE$30,000
RAIR (RECYCLED ARTIST IN RESIDENCY)$30,000
HORIZONS AT NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOL$25,000
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC$25,000
EDESIA INC$20,000
AN OPEN BOOK FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RAPP AT HOME: $5k → 10%RAPP AT HOME: $5k → 10%RAPP AT HOME: $5k → 10%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $15k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
MO
VA
NM
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 34 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
10

Total granted

$6.5M
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+90%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $585k · revenue +9%
  • YF
    YOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $565k · revenue +88%
  • CS
    Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $310k · revenue +981%

Funded once

  • EN
    EVERY NATIONS CHURCHES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • NC
    NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOL HORIZONS ENRICHMENT PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

Philanthropy
2
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
3
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
7
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
8
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
9
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
10
Conservation X Labs Inc

To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.

Animals
11
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New Canaan Country School Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Apie Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $780,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERYSMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $470,000 · OtherSMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTEHORIZONS AT NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOL: $275,000 · OtherHORIZONS AT NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOLCAF AMERICA CO FRIENDS OF TUSK: $215,000 · OtherCAF AMERICA CO FRIENDS OF TUSKYOU CAN FREE US: $165,000 · OtherAUDUBON FLORIDA: $142,000 · OtherGreensgrow Inc: $140,000 · Other+26 more: $1,465,000 · Other+26 moreYOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION: $565,000 · InternationalYOUCANFREEUS FO…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUN…WILDLIFEDIRECT INC: $55,000 · InternationalWILDLIFEDIRECT …SARATOGA WARHORSE FOUNDATION INC: $605,000 · Public BenefitSARATOGA …The River School: $305,000 · EducationThe River…AN OPEN BOOK FOUNDATION: $180,000 · EducationAN OPEN B…THE NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $100,000 · EducationTHE NEW C…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $585,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRI…Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: $310,000 · Arts & CultureRAIR INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS AIR AND SPACE MUSEUMINC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureDC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $160,000 · Human ServicesRESTORE NYC INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesRAPP AT HOME: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$3,652,000International$945,000Public Benefit$605,000Education$590,000Science & Tech$585,000Arts & Culture$365,000Human Services$200,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARATOGA WARHORSE FOUNDATION INC: $605,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $585,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION: $565,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: $310,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetThe River School: $305,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAN OPEN BOOK FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetDC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $160,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetGreensgrow Inc: $140,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetRARE: $105,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHALO FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWILDLIFEDIRECT INC: $55,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAIR INC: $30,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetRESTORE NYC INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHUNTERS CMT4B3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTEXAS AIR AND SPACE MUSEUMINC: $25,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetSHINING LIGHT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetRAPP AT HOME: $15,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetHYGIENIC ART INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetNEW CANAAN CARES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARATOGA WARHORSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds YOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc ↗
  • Who funds The River School ↗
  • Who funds AN OPEN BOOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DC KINCARE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Greensgrow Inc ↗
  • Who funds RARE ↗
  • Who funds SMITH MEMORIAL PLAYGROUND & PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW CANAAN COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HALO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFEDIRECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds RAIR INC ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTERS CMT4B3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS AIR AND SPACE MUSEUMINC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

All the Little Ones FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: All the Little Ones Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cedar Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cedar Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cedar Hill’s filings →

More from the funding graph