· Private foundation
All the Little Ones Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $276k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVERY NATION NEW YORK CITY INC | $188,000 |
| YOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION | $88,000 |
| EVERY NATION NEW YORK CITY INC | $30,500 |
| EVERY NATION CHURCHES & MINISTRIES | $15,000 |
| STRAY DOG SUPPORT INC | $12,500 |
| PRISON IN THE WILD INC | $12,000 |
| FESSENDEN SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| YOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| YOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| LEVANT MINISTRIES INC | $5,000 |
| ANIMAL MIRACLES INC | $2,500 |
| KINGS PARK INTERNATIONAL CHURCH INC | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YFYOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2025 · $139k · revenue +41%
- PIPRISON IN THE WILD INC5× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +25%
- SDSTRAY DOG SUPPORT INC4× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- RUReaching Unreached Nations Incone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -45%
- VEV Edmonsone grant, 2021 · $5k
- RNRESTORE NYC INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…
We exist to accelerate and resource the fight against sex trafficking and exploitation.
Cultivating the empowerment of women globally who promote animal activism and welfare. women united. men invited
To restore the lives of those who have been rescued from sexual exploitation
Missions.me empowers people to change the world. whether it is introducing a street orphan to their new home, leading a nation in a prayer of reconciliation, offering medical relief to the suffering, or hosting large missions teams,…
She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…
Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.
The rescue and rehabilitation of canines.
No dog should endure pain & suffering of a life of abandonment & neglect
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Miracles Inc and the most unlike its peers is Prison in the Wild Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUCANFREEUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRISON IN THE WILD INC ↗
- Who funds Reaching Unreached Nations Inc ↗
- Who funds SUJO JOHN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds STRAY DOG SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds LEVANT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Zanis Furry Friends ZFF Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FESSENDEN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FREE TO RUN INC ↗
- Who funds RESTORE NYC INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL MIRACLES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN OF WONDER WOW INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HOUNDS IN POUNDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cedar Hill Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization All the Little Ones Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Fessenden School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.