Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Casa Inc

To create a more just society by building power and improving the quality of life in working-class black, latino/a/e, afro-descendent, indigenous, and immigrant communities.

$765k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$298k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Civil Rights$748kHuman Services$722kInternational$399kHealth$189kCrime & Legal$100kEducation$80kCommunity Improvement$75kYouth Development$70kPhilanthropy$35kOther$336k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $641,802 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $765,467 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $123,665 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $196k
  • $250k+1 grant · $298k
$40,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALIANZA AMERICAS$297,651
UNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC$82,651
CARECEN OF CALIFORNIA$63,000
MARYLAND CITIZENS HEALTH INITIATIVE EDUCATION FUND INC$50,000
COPAL EDUC FUND (C3)$40,000
HEARTSMILES INC$35,000
EMPOWERMENT FOR COLLECTIVE CHANGE$32,500
NICARAGUAN-AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE FUND (NALDEF)$16,000
NEW INITIATIVE FOR CIVIC ENGAGEMENT (NICE)$15,000
LILA LATINX LGBTQI INITIATIVE INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $722k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Promise Arizona: $25k → 11%Services Immigrant Rights & Education Network: $18k → 8%HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC: $9k → 17%El Centro de Igualdad y Derechos: $5k → 14%ARKANSAS UNITED COMMUNITY COALITION: $18k → 14%Voces de la Frontera Inc: $33k → 17%COALICION LATINOAMERICANA: $18k → 10%LILA LATINX LGBTQI INITIATIVE INC: $10k → 11%CASA IN ACTION INC: $390k → 11%PROMISE ARIZONA: $25k → 11%SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCATION NETWORK: $18k → 8%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $5k → 14%Arkansas United Community Coalition: $18k → 14%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC: $33k → 17%Coalicion Latinoamericana: $18k → 10%CONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS: $5k → 14%Consejo de Federaciones Mexicanas: $5k → 14%CARECEN OF CALIFORNIA: $63k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 33 repeat orgs$889k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
7

Total granted

$1.9M
$662k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

94%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $227k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’24’25
Civil RightsHuman ServicesInternationalHealthEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Make the Road New York
    2× · 2017–2018 · $90k · revenue +35%
  • IC
    ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $90k · revenue +642%
  • CF
    COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $90k · revenue +284%

Funded once

  • CI
    CASA IN ACTION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $390k · revenue +21%
  • CF
    Care for Your Health Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $104k · revenue 0%
  • ND
    NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +172%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
2
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
3
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
4
Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights

VACIR is a multi-racial and multi-ethnic coalition of organizations that exists to win dignity, power and quality of life for all immigrant and refugee communities.

Human Services
5
Latino Political Network
—
6
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
7
California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice

Ccij utilizes coordination, advocacy, and legal services to fight for the liberationof immigrants in detention in california. we seek to empower immigrants in detentionand their communities through technical assistance, education, and…

—
8
Arriba Las Vegas Worker Center

Facilitates efforts for immigrants and low income workers to raise up their collective voice and fight for equality, economic justice, social, and political inclusion.

Civil Rights
9
Americans for Immigrant Justice Inc F/K/a Fla Immigrant Advocacy Center

To protect and promote the basic human rights of immigrants through a unique combination of free direct services, impact litigation, policy reform, and public education at local, state, and national levels.

Crime & Legal
10
Center for Immigrant Progress

The organizations primary exempt purpose is charitable and educational.

—
11
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
12
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Somos Un Pueblo Unido and the most unlike its peers is Sunflower Community Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…Christian Missionary Organi…Lgbtq+ Community CentersAsian American Advocacy & H…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%37%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%2%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%51%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/46
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,519

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
26/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $100,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZIN…ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $90,000 · Civil RightsILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRA…COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $90,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT…UNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC — $82,651 · Civil RightsUNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INCFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $65,000 · Civil RightsFlorida Immigrant Coalition In…NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $65,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVI…TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $65,000 · Civil RightsTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGE…COPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A — $40,000 · Civil RightsCOPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDA…PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA — $35,000 · Civil RightsMASSACHUSETTS IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE ADVOCACY COALITION INC — $35,000 · Civil RightsSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $35,000 · Civil RightsCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION — $35,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $10,000 · Civil RightsCASA IN ACTION INC — $390,000 · Human ServicesCASA IN ACTION INCVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INCCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California — $63,000 · Human ServicesCentral American Resource Cen…PROMISE ARIZONA — $50,000 · Human ServicesPROMISE ARIZONALatin American Coalition — $35,000 · Human ServicesArkansas United — $35,000 · Human ServicesSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN) — $35,000 · Human Services+5 more — $48,750 · Human Services+5 moreAlianza Americas — $364,516 · InternationalAlianza AmericasADHIKAAR FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE — $34,200 · InternationalADHIKAAR FOR HUM…EMPOWERMENT FOR COLLECTIVE CHANGE — $85,000 · OtherEMPOWERMENT FOR COLLE…SUNFLOWER COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $65,000 · OtherSUNFLOWER COMMUNITY A…NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $65,000 · OtherNEW YORK IMMIGRATION …CAUSA OF OREGON — $35,000 · OtherCAUSA OF OREGONComunidades UnidasCommunities United — $35,000 · OtherComunidades UnidasCom…TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $65,000 · OtherTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJ…HEARTSMILES INC — $70,031 · OtherHEARTSMILES INCMICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT — $35,000 · OtherMICHIGAN ORGANIZING P…+5 more — $61,000 · Other+5 moreCare for Your Health Inc — $104,203 · HealthMARYLAND CITIZENS' HEALTH INITIATIVE EDUCATION FUND INC — $85,000 · HealthMake the Road New York — $90,000 · Crime & LegalNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $10,000 · Crime & LegalWORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT — $65,000 · EducationGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $15,000 · Education
Civil Rights$747,651Human Services$721,750International$398,716Other$516,031Health$189,203Crime & Legal$100,000Education$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASA IN ACTION INC — $390,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetAlianza Americas — $364,516 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCare for Your Health Inc — $104,203 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMake the Road New York — $90,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $90,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $90,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMARYLAND CITIZENS' HEALTH INITIATIVE EDUCATION FUND INC — $85,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetUNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC — $82,651 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHEARTSMILES INC — $70,031 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $65,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $65,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWORKERS DEFENSE PROJECT — $65,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $65,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $65,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $65,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $65,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California — $63,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROMISE ARIZONA — $50,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetPROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA — $35,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE ADVOCACY COALITION INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLatin American Coalition — $35,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCAUSA OF OREGON — $35,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT — $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $35,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION — $35,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetArkansas United — $35,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN) — $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetADHIKAAR FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE — $34,200 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS — $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE UNITED — $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetJUNTA FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetIOWA CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC — $8,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Center for Community …NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundCenter for Community …National Immigration …Tides FoundationMarguerite Casey Foun…National Partnership …Immigrant Legal Resou…Fwdus Education Fund …Rockefeller Philanthr…
Center for Community ChangeDC51.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Community Change · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Center for Community Change Action · National Immigration Law Center · Tides Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · National Partnership for New Americans · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Fwdus Education Fund Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Casa Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Junta for Progressive Action Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines