How much does Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc give?

Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc reported 34 grants totaling $66,355 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 31 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (34%), Education (11%), Religion (11%).

Who are Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Children's Hospital Los Angeles ($60k), Kehillat Israel Reconstructionist Congregation of Pacific Palisades ($54k), Olympic Music Festival ($45k).

Does Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Seattle Foundation, Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, Network for Good.

Where is Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc based?

Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc is based in CA.

Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc

Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$10k

Largest

01What it funds

0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$141kEducation$46kReligion$45kArts & Culture$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kEnvironment$36kPhilanthropy$28kInternational$26kOther$0

02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k32 grants · $46k
$10k–50k2 grants · $20k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$649k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES	$10,000
FIERO MARINE LIFE CENTER	$10,000
KEHILLAT ISRAEL	$9,869
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION	$5,000
OLYMPIC MUSIC FESTIVAL	$5,000
UCLA FOUNDATION	$4,500
FIELD ARTS & EVENTS HALL	$2,500
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF S CA	$2,000
ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION	$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION	$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI	$1,500
DUNGENESS RIVER NATURE CENTER	$1,061
Individual grant recipient	$1,000
University of Southern California	$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$400k · 38 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$400k

$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+117%

Still filing today

76%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +78%
OM
OLYMPIC MUSIC FESTIVAL
9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +37%
AN
American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +46%

Funded once

CR
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SOCAL
one grant, 2021 · $5k
LL
LOMA LINA UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2021 · $3k
A
ADVOTgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +117%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health

The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—

Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health

New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health

University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education

Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education

The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education

Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—

Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tap Cancer Out Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

44/44

Grantees still filing

32/44

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$198,127Health$105,981Education$54,388Human Services$37,562Public Safety & Disaster$35,250Environment$28,861International$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Cappy and Beth Rothman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home