· Private foundation
Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k31 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEHILLAT ISRAEL | $11,150 |
| North Olympic Land Trust | $10,000 |
| OLYMPIC MUSIC FESTIVAL | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES | $5,000 |
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES | $2,581 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,031 |
| CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF S CA | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| University of Southern California | $1,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $1,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $1,000 |
| DUNGENESS RIVER NATURE CENTER | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
37 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Los Angeles8× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +78%
- OMOLYMPIC MUSIC FESTIVAL8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +37%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- CRCARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SOCALone grant, 2021 · $5k
- LLLOMA LINA UNIVERSITYone grant, 2021 · $3k
- AADVOTgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +117%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.
Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tap Cancer Out Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds OLYMPIC MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds NORTH OLYMPIC LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUNGENESS RIVER NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ZAWADI INC ↗
- Who funds ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADVOT ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds Unatti Foundation ↗
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cappy and Beth Rothman Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.