Skip to content

· Private foundation

Capek Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$521k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$993kFood & Nutrition$90kPhilanthropy$60kHealth$50kInternational$50kArts & Culture$40kAnimals$35kHousing & Shelter$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $345k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$120,000
FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION$50,000
SUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION$35,000
WALTER HOVING HOMES$25,000
UNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER$25,000
CARENET PREGNANCY RESOURCES$25,000
MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
MOHAWK VALLEY FUTURE FARMERS OF AM$20,000
GRACE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PANTRY$20,000
MOTHER HUBBARD'S CUPBOARD$15,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST OF METRO DETROIT$15,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY CAREER SERVICES$10,000
COUNTRY WOMENS CLUB OF CAMPBELL$10,000
LIFE MOVES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARINGWORKS: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY CAREER SERVICES: $10k → 14%FAMILIES FIRST: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$361k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$1.0M
$34k

Still filing today

18%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $327k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsFood & NutritionEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    6× · 2020–2025 · $760k · revenue +13%
  • SO
    SUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $95k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • RA
    RENSSELAER ANNUAL FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • OS
    OESJ SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • OC
    OESJ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
2
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
3
Family Supportive Housing Inc

Family supportive housing, inc. is committed to the entire family and encourages families to stay intact while addressing their needs for food, shelter, education, and employment. the organization provides shelter, housing opportunities…

Human Services
4
Homeward Bound of Marin

Homeward Bound is the main provider of emergency shelter, supportive housing and services for people overcoming a crisis of homelessness in Marin County, California. Our mission of "opening doors to safety, dignity, hope, and…

Housing & Shelter
5
Samaritan House

Fighting poverty. lifting lives. we mobilize the resources of our community to help those among us who are in need. our dedicated professional staff and volunteers work together to provide food, access to shelter, healthcare, and a broad…

—
6
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
7
West Valley Community Services of Santa Clara County Inc

Our mission is to unite the community to fight hunger and homelessness. our vision is a community where every person has food on the table and every person has a roof over their head.

Housing & Shelter
8
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
9
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
10
The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

Health
11
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
12
Hamilton Families

Hamilton families' mission is to end family homelessness in the san francisco bay area.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifemoves; the most unlike its peers is Find Your Light Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
4/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $760,000 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteSUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherSUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATIONCOLLEGE ONEONTA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCOLLEGE ONEONTA FOUNDATIONAMERICAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLCARENET PREGNANCY RESOURCES: $25,000 · OtherCARENET PREGNANCY RESOURCESMOHAWK VALLEY FUTURE FARMERS OF AM: $20,000 · OtherGRACE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PANTRY: $20,000 · OtherMother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington Inc: $15,000 · OtherFORGOTTEN HARVEST OF METRO DETROIT: $15,000 · Other+18 more: $120,000 · Other+18 moreUNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyFIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 · AnimalsCaringWorks Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIRST INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME: $25,000 · HealthSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Education$760,000Other$410,000Philanthropy$110,000Animals$35,000Human Services$30,000Health$25,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $760,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCaringWorks Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC ↗
  • Who funds FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME ↗
  • Who funds Mother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington Inc ↗
  • Who funds CaringWorks Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Capek Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Capek Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Capek Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph