· Private foundation
Capek Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $345k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE | $120,000 |
| FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| SUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| CARENET PREGNANCY RESOURCES | $25,000 |
| WALTER HOVING HOMES | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER | $25,000 |
| MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY | $25,000 |
| MOHAWK VALLEY FUTURE FARMERS OF AM | $20,000 |
| GRACE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PANTRY | $20,000 |
| MOTHER HUBBARD'S CUPBOARD | $15,000 |
| FORGOTTEN HARVEST OF METRO DETROIT | $15,000 |
| CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY | $10,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ATLANTA | $10,000 |
| LIFE MOVES | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $327k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute6× · 2020–2025 · $760k · revenue +13%- SOSUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $95k
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- RARENSSELAER ANNUAL FUNDone grant, 2020 · $10k
- OSOESJ SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2023 · $10k
- OCOESJ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
Family supportive housing, inc. is committed to the entire family and encourages families to stay intact while addressing their needs for food, shelter, education, and employment. the organization provides shelter, housing opportunities…
Homeward Bound is the main provider of emergency shelter, supportive housing and services for people overcoming a crisis of homelessness in Marin County, California. Our mission of "opening doors to safety, dignity, hope, and…
Fighting poverty. lifting lives. we mobilize the resources of our community to help those among us who are in need. our dedicated professional staff and volunteers work together to provide food, access to shelter, healthcare, and a broad…
Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.
Our mission is to unite the community to fight hunger and homelessness. our vision is a community where every person has food on the table and every person has a roof over their head.
Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.
To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.
The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.
At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.
Hamilton families' mission is to end family homelessness in the san francisco bay area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifemoves and the most unlike its peers is Find Your Light Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC ↗
- Who funds FIND YOUR LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Mother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
- Who funds CaringWorks Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Capek Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.