· Public charity
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids
We passionately champion & advocate for evidence-based policies that protect children, improve health and save the most lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $1,041,195 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,662,063 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,620,868 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $292k
- $250k+2 grants · $648k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC | $373,536 |
| UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF | $274,075 |
| NATIONAL LGBT CANCER NETWORK | $83,750 |
| PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATIONWHO-PAHO | $78,459 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NEGRO WOMEN | $75,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR BLACK HEALTH AND EQUITY | $54,375 |
| JACK AND JILL OF AMERICA INC | $37,500 |
| NATIONAL PTA | $22,500 |
| CHAMPLAIN VALLEY FAMILY CENTER | $22,000 |
| ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS (ASTHO) | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $9.6M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT · TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT · GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT · GLOBL HEALTH GRANT
Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT · TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EIEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +59%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $1.2M · revenue +33%
- AOASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS5× · 2021–2025 · $170k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- TKTOBACCO-FREE KIDS ACTION FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $380k · revenue +85%
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INCone grant, 2024 · $63k · revenue 0%- SASAVE A GIRL SAVE A WORLDone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…
NAQC's mission is to promote effective tobacco cessation services by maximizing the access, use, and effectiveness of quitlines; provide leadership and a unified voice to promote quitlines; and offer a forum to link those interested in…
To prevent and control chronic diseases, also called non-communicable diseases or NCDs, in the region of the Americas by promoting an environment conducive to health, well-being, social and economic development. This mission is…
To advocate for innovative legal and policy measures to end the global tobacco epidemic.
The national association of county and city health officials' (naccho) mission is to be a leader, partner, catalyst, and voice for local public health departments in order to ensure the conditions that promote equity and health, to combat…
Promoting the advancement of black healthcare professionals.
Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.
To provide a united voice for people with chronic diseases and disabilities.
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
Nevada cancer coalition works to reduce the burden of cancer in nevada by fostering statewide collaboration, empowering people with information and connections, and advocating for equitable access to care.
To develop leadership to end the HIV/AIDS epidemic through a variety of programs and services, including: a public policy education program, national and regional training conferences, a treatment and research program, numerous electronic…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund and the most unlike its peers is National Council of Negro Women Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK WOMENS HEALTH PROJECT dba BLACK WOMENS HEALTH IMPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS ↗
- Who funds LULAC INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LGBT CANCER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds The Center for Black Health and Equity ↗
- Who funds National Council of Negro Women Inc ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE A GIRL SAVE A WORLD ↗
- Who funds Parents Against Vaping E-Cigarettes Action Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds National Congress of Parents & Teachers ↗
- Who funds JACK & JILL OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY FAMILY CTR FOR DRU TREATMT & YOUTH SVCS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HISPANIC COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds OUT Maine ↗
- Who funds CAFFEE CAFFEE AND ASSOC PHF INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG DEPENDENCE OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund · AARP · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.