· Public charity
Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund
We passionately champion & advocate for evidence-based policies that protect children, improve health and save the most lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $1,229,307 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,431,549 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,202,242 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $660k
- $250k+1 grant · $467k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARENTS AGAINST VAPING E-CIGARETTES | $466,667 |
| NATIONAL PTA | $161,655 |
| PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATIONWHO-PAHO | $105,617 |
| UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF | $80,993 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NEGRO WOMEN | $75,000 |
| NAACP ENOWERMENT PROGRAMS | $62,500 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR MEDICAL WELLBEING | $62,500 |
| NATIONAL LGBT CANCER NETWORK | $56,250 |
| ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS | $55,000 |
| 100 BLACK MEN OF AMERICA INC | $37,500 |
| JACK AND JILL OF AMERICA INC | $37,500 |
| THE CENTER FOR BLACK HEALTH AND EQUITY | $28,125 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $11M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT · GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT · GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT · TOBACCO CONTROLGRANT
Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT · GLOBL HEALTH GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT · GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT · GLOBAL HEALTHB GRANT
Stated purpose: GLOBAL HEALTH GRANT · TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
Stated purpose: TOBACCO CONTROL GRANT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $318k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAParents Against Vaping E-Cigarettes Action Fund Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $1.9M · revenue ×24 · 94% of their budget
- ACAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES FOUNDATION OF PENNSYLVANIA INC3× · 2022–2024 · $374k · revenue +36%
HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $344k · revenue +337%
Funded once
- FHFLAVORS HOOK OREGON KIDSone grant, 2022 · $100k
- AHAmerican Heart Association Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $78k · revenue +33%
- CFCAMPAIGN FOR A HEALTHY COLORADO (ONSITE PUBLIC AFFAIRS)one grant, 2017 · $53k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The national network of public health institutes, inc. (nnphi) is a national public health organization chartered on june 21, 2001. its mission is to support national public health system initiatives and strengthen public health institutes…
The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.
2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…
Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.
Help community leaders use the power of law and policy to improve america's health.
We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…
The hispanic health coalition of georgia (hhcga) is a 32+ year old 501 (c)3), which continues to serve the minority, underserved, and socio- economically challenged populations within the hispanic/latino, and hispanic/latino black members…
Npwh is the professional community for women's health nurse practitioners and other advanced practice registered nurses who provide women's and gender-related healthcare. we set a standard of excellence by generating, translating, and…
The purpose of nvic is to promote and encourage the health and welfare of american children and adults through its research and education-oriented programs to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths and to assist individuals (both children and…
To provide a united voice for people with chronic diseases and disabilities.
Mission: promote the highest standards of urological clinical care through education, research, and the formulation of health care policy.vision: to be the premier professional association for the advancement of professional urologic…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Empowerment Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Council of Negro Women Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT CALIFORNIA KIDS ↗
- Who funds Parents Against Vaping E-Cigarettes Action Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES FOUNDATION OF PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds National Congress of Parents & Teachers ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LGBT CANCER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds National Council of Negro Women Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds The Center for Black Health and Equity ↗
- Who funds JACK & JILL OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.